ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2022
ScalpelSig Designs Targeted Genomic Panels from Data to Detect Activity of Mutational Signatures.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive molecular landscape of anal squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of tissue and liquid biopsies from 1844 patients.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical impact of UV mutational signatures in Veterans with cancer.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Tissue-based genomic profiling of 300,000 tumors highlights the detection of variants with low allele fraction.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- The Molecular Landscape of Gastric Cancers for Novel Targeted Therapies from Real-World Genomic Profiling.Targeted oncology · 2024Article
- Diagnosis of Ovarian Carcinoma Homologous Recombination DNA Repair Deficiency From Targeted Gene Capture Oncology Assays.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, a promising line of cancer research has utilized machine learning to mine statistical patterns of mutations in cancer genomes for information. Recent work shows that these statistical patterns, commonly referred to as "mutational signatures," have diverse therapeutic potential as biomarkers for cancer therapies. However, translating this potential into reality is hindered by limited access to sequencing in the clinic. Almost all methods for mutational signature analysis (MSA) rely on whole genome or whole exome sequencing data, while sequencing in the clinic is typically limited to small gene panels. To improve clinical access to MSA, we considered the question of whether targeted panels could be designed for the purpose of mutational signature detection. Here we present ScalpelSig, to our knowledge the first algorithm that automatically designs genomic panels optimized for detection of a given mutational signature. The algorithm learns from data to identify genome regions that are particularly indicative of signature activity. Using a cohort of breast cancer genomes as training data, we show that ScalpelSig panels substantially improve accuracy of signature detection compared to baselines. We find that some ScalpelSig panels even approach the performance of whole exome sequencing, which observes over 10 × as much genomic material. We test our algorithm under a variety of conditions, showing that its performance generalizes to another dataset of breast cancers, to smaller panel sizes, and to lesser amounts of training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.