Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34986026›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2022

ScalpelSig Designs Targeted Genomic Panels from Data to Detect Activity of Mutational Signatures.

Nicholas Franzese, Jason Fan, Roded Sharan, Mark D M Leiserson

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas FranzeseDepartment of Computer Science and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-8017
Jason FanDepartment of Computer Science and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7617-4814
Roded SharanSchool of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mark D M LeisersonDepartment of Computer Science and Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1034-4363
University of Maryland, College Park · USNorthwestern University · USTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, a promising line of cancer research has utilized machine learning to mine statistical patterns of mutations in cancer genomes for information. Recent work shows that these statistical patterns, commonly referred to as "mutational signatures," have diverse therapeutic potential as biomarkers for cancer therapies. However, translating this potential into reality is hindered by limited access to sequencing in the clinic. Almost all methods for mutational signature analysis (MSA) rely on whole genome or whole exome sequencing data, while sequencing in the clinic is typically limited to small gene panels. To improve clinical access to MSA, we considered the question of whether targeted panels could be designed for the purpose of mutational signature detection. Here we present ScalpelSig, to our knowledge the first algorithm that automatically designs genomic panels optimized for detection of a given mutational signature. The algorithm learns from data to identify genome regions that are particularly indicative of signature activity. Using a cohort of breast cancer genomes as training data, we show that ScalpelSig panels substantially improve accuracy of signature detection compared to baselines. We find that some ScalpelSig panels even approach the performance of whole exome sequencing, which observes over 10 × as much genomic material. We test our algorithm under a variety of conditions, showing that its performance generalizes to another dataset of breast cancers, to smaller panel sizes, and to lesser amounts of training data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMutationWhole Genome Sequencingcancer genomicscombinatorial optimizationmutational signatures

Identifiers

PMID34986026
PMCPMC8812502
OpenAlexW4206634988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.