ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022
Clinical Validation of the Xpert MTB/RIF Test for Identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Acid-Fast Bacillus Smear-Positive MGIT Broth Cultures.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the deeplex Myc-TB-targeted next-generation sequencing assay for mycobacterial identification and drug resistance detection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostics and new treatment regimens for TB: can the Xpert MTB/XDR assay fill the gap for fluoroquinolone testing?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Importance of Verifying the Cycle Threshold for Positive Results From Xpert MTB/RIF Assay, Performed on the GeneXpert Instrument Systems.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Limitations of the MTB/RIF Assay: An Xpert Review of 4 Clinical Cases.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Development of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis and Multidrug Resistance.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Rapid Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Approaches for Use in the Clinical Laboratory.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) from smear-positive broth cultures can be achieved using several methods, including both lab-developed and commercially available molecular assays. In the United States, a commercially available probe-based assay has been used for over a decade by many laboratories for identification of MTBC directly from acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear-positive broth cultures, including those recovered from the MGIT 960 system. However, recent difficulties in obtaining probe kits for identification resulted in mycobacteriology laboratories looking for alternative platforms to provide for rapid identification of MTBC and detection of rifampin resistance. The Xpert MTB/RIF test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) has shown high sensitivity for the diagnosis of MTBC from pulmonary specimens but is not often used for identification directly from smear-positive MGIT 960 broth cultures (Becton, Dickinson, Sparks, MD). We sought to validate the Xpert MTB/RIF test for use with AFB smear-positive MGIT 960 cultures in a clinical hospital setting. Overall, the assay showed a categorical agreement of 100% for identification of MTBC and detection of rifampin resistance. No false-positive results or cross-reactivity were noted. Findings indicate that the Xpert MTB/RIF test may be suitable as a rapid replacement for identification of MTBC and detection of rifampin resistance from AFB smear-positive MGIT 960 broth cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.