Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985771›Full record

Trial reportCancer2022

TrueNTH Sexual Recovery Intervention for couples coping with prostate cancer: Randomized controlled trial results.

Daniela Wittmann, Akanksha Mehta, Sharon L Bober, Ziwei Zhu, Stephanie Daignault-Newton, Rodney L Dunn, Thomas M Braun, Caroline Carter, Ashley Duby, Laurel L Northouse and 18 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela WittmannDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-7269
Akanksha MehtaDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-8226-7793
Sharon L BoberSexual Health Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-2620
Ziwei ZhuDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Stephanie Daignault-NewtonDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Rodney L DunnDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Thomas M BraunDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Caroline CarterDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ashley DubyDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Laurel L NorthouseDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bridget F KoontzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
L Michael GlodéSchool of Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Jan BrandonPartner advocate, Bethesda, Maryland.
Rick BangsPatient advocate, Bethesda, Maryland.
John McPhailPatient advocate, Bethesda, Maryland.
Susan McPhailPartner advocate, Bethesda, Maryland.
Lenore ArabDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Kellie PaichMovember Foundation, Los Angeles, California.
Ted A SkolarusDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-5859-8151
Lawrence C AnDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Christian J NelsonMale Sexual and Reproductive Medicine Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York.
Christopher S SaigalDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Ronald C ChenDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
John P MulhallCenter for Sexual and Reproductive Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sarah T HawleyDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jason W D HearnDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Daniel E SprattDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-5973-4741
Craig E PollackDepartment of Health Policy and Management I School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-2464-6415
University of Michigan · USDuke University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USPatient Advocate Foundation · USEmory University · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMovember Foundation · AUUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Movember Foundation 15-PAF05268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant sexual dysfunction and distress after localized prostate cancer treatment, patients typically receive only physiologic erectile dysfunction management. The authors performed a randomized controlled trial of an online intervention supporting couples' posttreatment recovery of sexual intimacy.

methodsPatients treated with surgery, radiation, or combined radiation and androgen deprivation therapy who had partners were recruited and randomized to an online intervention or a control group. The intervention, tailored to treatment type and sexual orientation, comprised 6 modules addressing expectations for sexual and emotional sequelae of treatment, rehabilitation, and guidance toward sexual intimacy recovery. Couples, recruited from 6 sites nationally, completed validated measures at the baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Primary outcome group differences were assessed with t tests for individual outcomes.

resultsAmong 142 randomized couples, 105 patients (mostly surgery) and 87 partners completed the 6-month survey; this reflected challenges with recruitment and attrition. There were no differences between the intervention and control arms in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Satisfaction With Sex Life scores 6 months after treatment (the primary outcome). Three months after treatment, intervention patients and partners reported more engagement in penetrative and nonpenetrative sexual activities than controls. More than 73% of the intervention participants reported high or moderate satisfaction with module content; more than 85% would recommend the intervention to other couples.

conclusionsOnline psychosexual support for couples can help couples to connect and experience sexual pleasure early after treatment despite patients' sexual dysfunction. Participants' high endorsement of the intervention reflects the importance of sexual health support to couples after prostate cancer treatment. LAY SUMMARY: This study tested a web-based program supporting couples' sexual recovery of sexual intimacy after prostate cancer treatment. One hundred forty-two couples were recruited and randomly assigned to the program (n = 60) or to a control group (n = 82). The program did not result in improvements in participants' satisfaction with their sex life 6 months after treatment, but couples in the intervention group engaged in sexual activity sooner after treatment than couples in the control group. Couples evaluated the program positively and would recommend it to others facing prostate cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAndrogen Antagonistscouplesprostate cancerrehabilitationsexual dysfunctiontelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34985771
OpenAlexW4206738700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.