Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985651›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2022

The role of the microbiota in the management of intensive care patients.

Piotr Szychowiak, Khanh Villageois-Tran, Juliette Patrier, Jean-François Timsit, Étienne Ruppé

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Can We Identify Severe Dysbiosis at the Bedside?Critical care explorations · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The gastrointestinal microbiome in critical illness: A Clinician's guide to mechanisms, emerging tools, and therapeutic questions.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Host-Microbiome Interaction in the Intensive Care Unit.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Characterisation of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Beyond the organ: lung microbiome shapes transplant indications and outcomes.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Piotr SzychowiakUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, 75018, Paris, France.
Khanh Villageois-TranUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, 75018, Paris, France.
Juliette PatrierUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, 75018, Paris, France.
Jean-François TimsitUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, 75018, Paris, France.
Étienne RuppéUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, 75018, Paris, France. etienne.ruppe@aphp.fr.
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition of the gut microbiota is highly dynamic and changes according to various conditions. The gut microbiota mainly includes difficult-to-cultivate anaerobic bacteria, hence knowledge about its composition has significantly arisen from culture-independent methods based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) such as 16S profiling and shotgun metagenomics. The gut microbiota of patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU) undergoes many alterations because of critical illness, antibiotics, and other ICU-specific medications. It is then characterized by lower richness and diversity, and dominated by opportunistic pathogens such as Clostridioides difficile and multidrug-resistant bacteria. These alterations are associated with an increased risk of infectious complications or death. Specifically, at the time of writing, it appears possible to identify distinct microbiota patterns associated with severity or infectivity in COVID-19 patients, paving the way for the potential use of dysbiosis markers to predict patient outcomes. Correcting the microbiota disturbances to avoid their consequences is now possible. Fecal microbiota transplantation is recommended in recurrent C. difficile infections and microbiota-protecting treatments such as antibiotic inactivators are currently being developed. The growing interest in the microbiota and microbiota-associated therapies suggests that the control of the dysbiosis could be a key factor in the management of critically ill patients. The present narrative review aims to provide a synthetic overview of microbiota, from healthy individuals to critically ill patients. After an introduction to the different techniques used for studying the microbiota, we review the determinants involved in the alteration of the microbiota in ICU patients and the latter's consequences. Last, we assess the means to prevent or correct microbiota alteration.

Indexed as

C. difficileDysbiosisFecal microbiota transplantationIntensive careMicrobiotaMultidrug-resistant bacteriaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID34985651
PMCPMC8728486
OpenAlexW4206686575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.