Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985616›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2022

Why Size Matters: an Evaluation of Gastric Pouch Size in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Using CT Volumetric Analysis and its Effect on Marginal Ulceration.

Sullivan A Ayuso, Jordan N Robinson, Leslie M Okorji, Kyle J Thompson, Iain H McKillop, Timothy S Kuwada, Keith S Gersin, Selwan D Barbat, Roc W Bauman, Abdelrahman Nimeri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sullivan A AyusoAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA. sullivan.ayuso@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8722-4669
Jordan N RobinsonAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Leslie M OkorjiAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Kyle J ThompsonDivision of Research, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Iain H McKillopAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Timothy S KuwadaAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Keith S GersinAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Selwan D BarbatAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Roc W BaumanAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Abdelrahman NimeriAtrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Carolinas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMarginal ulceration (MU) is a common long-term complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The causes of MU after RYGB are multifactorial and include surgical technique of constructing the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between gastric pouch size in RYGB and MU using CT volumetrics. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients were retrospectively identified who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) following RYGB at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Measurement of gastric pouch size was performed using 3-D CT software. Standard statistical methods were used, a univariate comparison was performed between MU and non-MU patients followed by a propensity-matched comparison to control for factors known to affect MU, and a propensity-matched subgroup analysis was also performed.

resultsIn total, 122 patients met criteria, 57 of which had MU on EGD and 65 who did not. The MU group had more smokers and patients with PPI use than the non-MU group, and the mean time from operation to CT scan was 26.6 months (range: 0-108 months). The MU group had a larger gastric pouch size than the non-MU group (34.1 ± 11.8 versus 20.1 ± 6.8 cm

conclusionsCT volumetric analysis demonstrated that a larger gastric pouch size was associated with MU following RYGB.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidHumansRetrospective StudiesStomachTomography, X-Ray ComputedUlcerComputed tomographyGastric pouchMarginal ulcerationRoux-en-Y gastric bypassVolumetric analysis

Identifiers

PMID34985616
OpenAlexW4206541114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.