ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2022
Does PAX7 and NKX2.2 immunoreactivity in Ewing sarcoma have prognostic significance?
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic landscape of Ewing sarcoma primary tumors and metastases.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Primary Ewing's Sarcoma of the Sinonasal Region: A Rare Clinical Encounter.Case reports in pathology · 2026Article
- Molecular and biologic biomarkers of Ewing sarcoma: A systematic review.Journal of bone oncology · 2023Review
- Ewing and Ewing-like sarcomas: A morphological guide through genetically-defined entities.Pathology international · 2023Review
- Integrated Immunotherapy Target Atlas for Ewing Sarcoma.Cancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive neoplasm with variable morphology. It has no specific immunoprofile or molecular signature. Neither CD99, NKX2.2 nor PAX7 immunoreactivity alone is completely specific, although diagnostic specificity improves when combined. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of PAX7 in a large series of genetically confirmed ES. Existing results for CD99 and NKX2.2 immunoexpression, morphological findings and molecular studies (fusion gene subtypes) were retrieved from a previous study. Survival analyses were performed in cases with available clinical follow-up. PAX7 was positive in 95.5% of ES with diffuse staining (> 50%) in all positive cases and moderate or strong intensity for most cases. Nineteen ES displayed both PAX7 and CD99 immunoreactivity but lacked NKX2.2 immunoexpression. No relationships could be found between PAX7 expression and the histological types or ES gene fusion subtypes. Univariant/multivariate analysis showed that lack of PAX7 and/or NKX2.2 immunoexpression constitute independent poor prognostic factors for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In conclusion, IHC for CD99, NKX2.2, and PAX7 may be useful in daily practice for ES diagnosis, particularly in hospitals lacking facilities for molecular studies. In addition, the combination of strong CD99 membranous positivity and nuclear PAX7 and NKX2.2 immunoreactivity seems to be very reliable for ES diagnosis when supported by a corroborating histomorphologic and clinical picture. Although PAX7 is not entirely specific for ES, it seems to have a more extensive and strong nuclear immunoreactivity than NKX2.2 expression, even in tumors with decalcification artifact. Considering the prognostically significant data herein reported, we strongly recommend validation in prospective ES series that include localized and disseminated tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.