Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985503›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2022

Impact of Portable Normothermic Blood-Based Machine Perfusion on Outcomes of Liver Transplant: The OCS Liver PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial.

James F Markmann, Marwan S Abouljoud, R Mark Ghobrial, Chandra S Bhati, Shawn J Pelletier, Amy D Lu, Shane Ottmann, Tarunjeet Klair, Corey Eymard, Garrett R Roll and 25 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02522871 (International Randomized Trial to Evaluate The Effectiveness of The Portable Organ Care System), which is not on this map. Cited by 180 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
75.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02522871 nacompletednot on this map

International Randomized Trial to Evaluate The Effectiveness of The Portable Organ Care System (OCS™) Liver For Preserving and Assessing Donor Livers for Transplantation (OCS Liver PROTECT Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTransMedicsRan2016 to 2021Enrolled300ConditionsLiver Transplantation, Liver Preservation for TransplantArmsOCS™ Liver System, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 366 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Machine perfusion in liver transplantation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment of Machine Perfusion Systems for Human Liver Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Biliary Viability Assessment and Treatment Options of Biliary Injury During Normothermic Liver Perfusion-A Systematic Review.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

James F MarkmannMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Marwan S AbouljoudHenry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
R Mark GhobrialHouston Methodist, Houston, Texas.
Chandra S BhatiVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Shawn J PelletierUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Amy D LuTampa General, Tampa, Florida.
Shane OttmannJohns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Tarunjeet KlairUT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.
Corey EymardUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Garrett R RollUCSF, San Francisco, California.
Joseph MaglioccaEmory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Timothy L PruettUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Jorge ReyesUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Sylvester M BlackThe Ohio State University, Columbus.
Christopher L MarshScripps Clinic and Scripps Green Hospital, San Diego, California.
Gabriel SchnickelUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Milan KinkhabwalaMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Sander S FlormanMount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Shaheed MeraniUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Anthony J DemetrisUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Shoko KimuraMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Michael RizzariHenry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
Ashish SahariaHouston Methodist, Houston, Texas.
Marlon LevyVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Avinash AgarwalUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Francisco G CigarroaUT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.
James D EasonUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Shareef SyedUCSF, San Francisco, California.
W Kenneth WashburnThe Ohio State University, Columbus.
Justin ParekhUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Jang MoonMount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Alexander MaskinUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Heidi YehMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Parsia A VagefiUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Malcolm P MacConmaraUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USCity College of San Francisco · USHouston Methodist · USMount Sinai Health System · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USUniversity of Virginia · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USEmory University Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USMontefiore Medical Center · USScripps Green Hospital · USSeattle University · USTampa General Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota System · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceIschemic cold storage (ICS) of livers for transplant is associated with serious posttransplant complications and underuse of liver allografts.

objectiveTo determine whether portable normothermic machine perfusion preservation of livers obtained from deceased donors using the Organ Care System (OCS) Liver ameliorates early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and ischemic biliary complications (IBCs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis multicenter randomized clinical trial (International Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Portable Organ Care System Liver for Preserving and Assessing Donor Livers for Transplantation) was conducted between November 2016 and October 2019 at 20 US liver transplant programs. The trial compared outcomes for 300 recipients of livers preserved using either OCS (n = 153) or ICS (n = 147). Participants were actively listed for liver transplant on the United Network of Organ Sharing national waiting list.

interventionsTransplants were performed for recipients randomly assigned to receive donor livers preserved by either conventional ICS or the OCS Liver initiated at the donor hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary effectiveness end point was incidence of EAD. Secondary end points included OCS Liver ex vivo assessment capability of donor allografts, extent of reperfusion syndrome, incidence of IBC at 6 and 12 months, and overall recipient survival after transplant. The primary safety end point was the number of liver graft-related severe adverse events within 30 days after transplant.

resultsOf 293 patients in the per-protocol population, the primary analysis population for effectiveness, 151 were in the OCS Liver group (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [10.3] years; 102 [67%] men), and 142 were in the ICS group (mean SD age, 58.6 [10.0] years; 100 [68%] men). The primary effectiveness end point was met by a significant decrease in EAD (27 of 150 [18%] vs 44 of 141 [31%]; P = .01). The OCS Liver preserved livers had significant reduction in histopathologic evidence of ischemia-reperfusion injury after reperfusion (eg, less moderate to severe lobular inflammation: 9 of 150 [6%] for OCS Liver vs 18 of 141 [13%] for ICS; P = .004). The OCS Liver resulted in significantly higher use of livers from donors after cardiac death (28 of 55 [51%] for the OCS Liver vs 13 of 51 [26%] for ICS; P = .007). The OCS Liver was also associated with significant reduction in incidence of IBC 6 months (1.3% vs 8.5%; P = .02) and 12 months (2.6% vs 9.9%; P = .02) after transplant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This multicenter randomized clinical trial provides the first indication, to our knowledge, that normothermic machine perfusion preservation of deceased donor livers reduces both posttransplant EAD and IBC. Use of the OCS Liver also resulted in increased use of livers from donors after cardiac death. Together these findings indicate that OCS Liver preservation is associated with superior posttransplant outcomes and increased donor liver use.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02522871.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationDeathFemaleHumansLiverLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedOrgan PreservationPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID34985503
PMCPMC8733869
OpenAlexW4205666916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.