Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985331›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

SARS Antibody Testing in Children: Development of Oral Fluid Assays for IgG Measurements.

Katja Hoschler, Samreen Ijaz, Nick Andrews, Sammy Ho, Steve Dicks, Keerthana Jegatheesan, John Poh, Lenesha Warrener, Thivya Kankeyan, Frances Baawuah and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in primary and secondary school students and staff in England in the 2020/2021 school year: a longitudinal study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Main changes in the «COVID-19 in paediatrics» clinical practice guideline].Anales de pediatria (Barcelona, Spain : 2003) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Katja HoschlerVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4837-0433
Samreen IjazVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Nick AndrewsImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Sammy HoVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Steve DicksVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Keerthana JegatheesanVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
John PohVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Lenesha WarrenerVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Thivya KankeyanVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Frances BaawuahImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Joanne BeckmannEast London NHS Foundation Trustgrid.450709.f, London, United Kingdom.
Ifeanichukwu O OkikeDerbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom.
Shazaad AhmadManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Joanna GarstangBirmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trustgrid.439530.8, Aston, United Kingdom.
Andrew J BrentOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bernadette BrentOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Felicity AianoImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Kevin E BrownImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Mary E RamsayImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
David BrownVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
John V ParryVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Shamez N LadhaniImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Maria ZambonVirus Reference Department, Public Health Englandgrid.271308.f, London, United Kingdom.
Public Health England · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBirmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust · GBDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seroepidemiological studies to monitor antibody kinetics are important for assessing the extent and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in a population. Noninvasive sampling methods are advantageous for reducing the need for venipuncture, which may be a barrier to investigations, particularly in pediatric populations. Oral fluids are obtained by gingiva-crevicular sampling from children and adults and are very well accepted. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) based on these samples have acceptable sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional serum-based antibody EIAs and are suitable for population-based surveillance. We describe the development and evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG EIAs using SARS-CoV-2 viral nucleoprotein (NP) and spike (S) proteins in IgG isotype capture format and an indirect receptor-binding-domain (RBD) IgG EIA, intended for use in children as a primary endpoint. All three assays were assessed using a panel of 1,999 paired serum and oral fluids from children and adults participating in school SARS-CoV-2 surveillance studies during and after the first and second pandemic wave in the United Kingdom. The anti-NP IgG capture assay was the best candidate, with an overall sensitivity of 75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71 to 79%) and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 78 to 99%) compared with paired serum antibodies. Sensitivity observed in children (80%, 95% CI: 71 to 88%) was higher than that in adults (67%, CI: 60% to 74%). Oral fluid assays (OF) using spike protein and RBD antigens were also 99% specific and achieved reasonable but lower sensitivity in the target population (78%, 95% CI [68% to 86%] and 53%, 95% CI [43% to 64%], respectively).

Indexed as

AdolescentAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19Gingival Crevicular FluidHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesImmunoglobulin GInfantSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GantibodychildrenCOVID-19oral fluidschoolssurveys

Identifiers

PMID34985331
PMCPMC8729769
OpenAlexW4206775675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.