Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985261›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2022

Characterization of Per- and Polyfluorinated Alkyl Substances Present in Commercial Anti-fog Products and Their

Nicholas J Herkert, Christopher D Kassotis, Sharon Zhang, Yuling Han, Vivek Francis Pulikkal, Mei Sun, P Lee Ferguson, Heather M Stapleton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas J HerkertNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Box 90328, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3286-8934
Christopher D KassotisInstitute of Environmental Health Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States.
Sharon ZhangNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Box 90328, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
Yuling HanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States.
Vivek Francis PulikkalDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States.
Mei SunDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States.
P Lee FergusonNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Box 90328, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8367-7521
Heather M StapletonNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Box 90328, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9995-6517
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Environmental-Mixture Induced Metabolic DisruptionR00ES030405 · NIEHS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KASSOTIS, CHRISTOPHER DENNIS · 2020 to 2022
$744k
NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES030405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-fog sprays and solutions are used on eyeglasses to minimize the condensation of water vapor, particularly while wearing a mask. Given their water-repellent properties, we sought to characterize per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substance (PFAS) compounds in four anti-fog spray products, five anti-fog cloth products, and two commercial fluorosurfactant formulations suspected to be used in preparing anti-fog products. Fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) and fluorotelomer ethoxylates (FTEOs) were detected in all products and formulations. While 6:2 FTOH and the 6:2 FTEO polymeric series were predominant, one anti-fog cloth and one formulation contained 8:2, 10:2, 12:2, 14:2, and 16:2 FTOH and FTEO polymeric series. PFAS concentrations varied in samples and were detected at levels up to 25,000 μg/mL in anti-fog sprays and 185,000 μg (g cloth)

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsAlcoholsAnimalsFluorineMiceAlcoholsFluorineFluorocarbons3T3-L1adipogenic activityanti-fogendocrine disruptorsfluorotelomer ethoxylate (FTEOs)PFAS

Identifiers

PMID34985261
PMCPMC8908479
OpenAlexW4205183501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.