Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985207›Full record

ArticleNursing open2022

A study on accuracy and precision of fluid volume measurements by nurses, patients and healthy persons in a clinical setting.

Charlotte Frydenlund Michelsen, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen, Marie Lommer Bagger, Hanne Konradsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Digitizing fluid balance monitoring may offer a solution for optimizing patient care.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Evaluation of a real-life experience with a digital fluid balance monitoring technology.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte Frydenlund MichelsenSolarSack ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten Bo Søndergaard SvendsenMeasurelet ApS, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Marie Lommer BaggerMeasurelet ApS, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Hanne KonradsenDivision of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7477-125X
NKT Holding (Denmark) · DKSolarplan (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the accuracy and precision for assessing fluid intake by examining the ability of nurses, patients and healthy people to visually estimate fluid volumes, thereby reflecting the fluid monitoring process in clinical practice.

designA cross-sectional study.

methodsThis study used the convenience sampling method and involved twenty-five participants from three groups; nurses, patients and healthy people. The participants carried out a set of different visual volume assessments of two types of fluids using two fluid containers. The exact volumes were measured, and the results were compared with the target volumes.

resultsHigh variations were observed in the fluid volume assessments for patients, nurses and healthy persons and also were observed to be an effect of environmental factors (fluid container or fluid type) on volume perceptions. This highlights the importance of finding new and innovative ways of measuring fluids for oral intake in a hospital setting, to ensure accurate and reliable data on fluid balance and thereby increase patient safety.

Indexed as

DrinkingWater-Electrolyte BalanceCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansPatient Safetyaccuracy and precisiondehydrationfluid balanceoral rehydration

Identifiers

PMID34985207
PMCPMC8859054
OpenAlexW4205461565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.