Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34985170›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2022

Balancing responsibilities, rewards and challenges: A qualitative study illuminating the complexity of being a rapid response team nurse.

Gitte Bunkenborg, Malene Barfod O'Connell, Hanne Irene Jensen, Tracey Bucknall

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gitte BunkenborgDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-9275
Malene Barfod O'ConnellDepartment of Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-8821
Hanne Irene JensenDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-4284
Tracey BucknallDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-3583
University of Southern Denmark · DKDeakin University · AUHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

The joint research foundation of the Region Zealand, Denmark and the Region of Southern Denmark RSJ-RS-2017-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM AND

objectiveTo explore Rapid Response Team nurses' perceptions of what it means being a Rapid Response Team nurse including their perceptions of the collaborative and organisational aspects of the rapid response team (RRT).

backgroundFor more than 20 years, RRT nurses have been on the frontline of critical situations in acute care hospitals. However, a few studies report nurses' perceptions of their role as RRT nurses, including collaboration with general ward nurses and physicians. This knowledge is important to guide development and adjustment of the RRT to benefit both patients' safety and team members' job satisfaction.

designQualitative focus group interviews.

methodsA qualitative approach was applied. Throughout 2018 and across three regions and three acute care settings in Denmark, eight focus group interviews were conducted in which 27 RRT nurses participated. Transcribed interviews were analysed using inductive content analysis. Reporting of this study followed the COREQ checklist.

resultsOne overarching theme 'Balancing responsibilities, rewards, and challenges' was derived, comprising six categories: 'Becoming, developing and fulfilling the RRT nurse role', 'Helping patients as the core function of RRT', 'The RRT-call at its best', 'The obvious and the subtle RRT tasks', 'Carrying the burden of the RRT', and 'Organisational benefits and barriers for an optimal RRT'.

conclusionBeing a RRT nurse is a complex task. Nurses experience professional satisfaction and find it meaningful helping deteriorating patients. The inadequate resources available to train general ward staff how to manage basic clinical tasks are an added stress to nurses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Organisational managers need a better understanding of the necessary staffing requirements to attend patients' needs, train staff and handle the increasing acuity of ward patients. Failure to do so will be detrimental to patient outcomes and compromise RRT nurses' job satisfaction.

Indexed as

Hospital Rapid Response TeamNursing Staff, HospitalAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchRewardcritical carecritical care outreachintensive carepatient safety

Identifiers

PMID34985170
PMCPMC9787103
OpenAlexW4205303651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.