Trial reportDermatologic therapy2022
Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in Chinese patients with anti-histamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria.
Trial report in Dermatologic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The International Guideline for the Definition, Classification, Diagnosis and Management of Urticaria.Allergy · 2026Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of Omalizumab in the treatment of CSU: a meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-effective omalizumab dosage for chronic urticaria: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Pooled it
- Time-course and dose-effect of omalizumab in treating chronic idiopathic urticaria/chronic spontaneous urticaria.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- The Effect of Placebo on Pruritus in Patients with Chronic Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of the treatment by Omalizumab for chronic idiopathic urticaria in the general population: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in Chinese patients with anti-histamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria.Dermatologic therapy · 2022Trial
- Thyroid autoantibodies predict long-term treatment response in euthyroid chronic spontaneous urticaria: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advance in Managing Indoor Cat Allergen Proteins: Molecular Insights, Detection, and Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cost-utility analysis of omalizumab for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria in China.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025Article
- Spectrum and Impact of Reported Side Effects of Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Urticaria: A Long-Term Multicentre Real-World Study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Article
- Biological and target synthetic treatments for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Article
- Research hotspots in urticaria: A bibliometric study of the top 100 most cited articles.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
- Different doses and courses of omalizumab for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Chronic Urticaria: A Clinical Observational Study.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2024Observational
- Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Hong Kong: Clinical Characteristics, Real-World Practice and Implications for COVID-19 Vaccination.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of omalizumab against chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real-world study from China.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies in Treating Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: New Drugs for an Old Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the spontaneous development of wheals, itching, and/or angioedema, for ≥6 weeks. In China, non-sedating H1-antihistamines (H1AH) are the recommended first-line treatment, with escalation up to 4× the standard dose in symptomatic patients to achieve control. Treatment options for Chinese patients who remain symptomatic on H1AH treatment are limited. This 20-week randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigated the efficacy and safety of omalizumab as an add-on therapy for the treatment of patients with CSU who remained symptomatic despite H1AH treatment in China. Adult patients (N = 418) diagnosed with refractory CSU for ≥6 months were randomized (2:2:1) to receive omalizumab 300 mg (OMA300), omalizumab 150 mg (OMA150) or placebo, subcutaneously, every 4 weeks. Primary outcome was change from baseline to week 12 in weekly itch severity score (ISS7). Safety was assessed by rates of adverse events (AEs). Demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were comparable across treatment groups. At week 12, statistically significant greater decreases from baseline were observed in ISS7 with OMA300 (least square mean difference [LSM]: -4.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.70, -2.77; p < 0.001) and OMA150 (LSM: -3.79; 95% CI: -5.24, -2.33; p < 0.001) versus placebo. Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs over 20 weeks was slightly higher with OMA300 (71.3%) compared to OMA150 and placebo groups (64.7% and 63.9%, respectively). The incidences of serious AEs were balanced between groups. This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in Chinese adult patients with CSU who remained symptomatic despite H1AH therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.