ArticleEpilepsia2022
Common functional connectivity alterations in focal epilepsies identified by machine learning.
Article in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abnormal functional connectivity patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy-An international ENIGMA-epilepsy study.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Language and Memory Network Alterations in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Functional and Structural Connectivity Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Zero-phase-delay synchrony between interacting neural populations: implications for functional connectivity-derived biomarkers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in epilepsy - applications and pathways to the clinic.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Unveiling the Core Functional Networks of Cognition: An Ontology-Guided Machine Learning Approach.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Imaging and Stereotactic Electroencephalography Functional Networks to Guide Epilepsy Surgery.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Combination of static and dynamic neural imaging features to distinguish sensorineural hearing loss: a machine learning study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Multi-shell connectome DWI-based graph theory measures for the prediction of temporal lobe epilepsy and cognition.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Abnormal brain functional network dynamics in sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Uncovering the biological basis of control energy: Structural and metabolic correlates of energy inefficiency in temporal lobe epilepsy.Science advances · 2022Article
- The Temporal Lobe as a Symptomatogenic Zone in Medial Parietal Lobe Epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Simultaneous electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of human brain function.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study was undertaken to identify shared functional network characteristics among focal epilepsies of different etiologies, to distinguish epilepsy patients from controls, and to lateralize seizure focus using functional connectivity (FC) measures derived from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
methodsData were taken from 103 adult and 65 pediatric focal epilepsy patients (with or without lesion on MRI) and 109 controls across four epilepsy centers. We used three whole-brain FC measures: parcelwise connectivity matrix, mean FC, and degree of FC. We trained support vector machine models with fivefold cross-validation (1) to distinguish patients from controls and (2) to lateralize the hemisphere of seizure onset in patients. We reported the regions and connections with the highest importance from each model as the common FC differences between the compared groups.
resultsFC measures related to the default mode and limbic networks had higher importance relative to other networks for distinguishing epilepsy patients from controls. In lateralization models, regions related to somatosensory, visual, default mode, and basal ganglia showed higher importance. The epilepsy versus control classification model trained using a 400-parcel connectivity matrix achieved a median testing accuracy of 75.6% (median area under the curve [AUC] = .83) in repeated independent testing. Lateralization accuracy using the 400-parcel connectivity matrix reached a median accuracy of 64.0% (median AUC = .69). SIGNIFICANCE: Machine learning models revealed common FC alterations in a heterogeneous group of patients with focal epilepsies. The distribution of the most altered regions supports the hypothesis that shared functional alteration exists beyond the seizure onset zone and its epileptic network. We showed that FC measures can distinguish patients from controls, and further lateralize focal epilepsies. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings by using larger numbers of epilepsy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.