ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022
The reproducibility of clinical OSA subtypes: a population-based longitudinal study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Symptom subtype progression in obstructive sleep apnea over 5 years.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024Article
- Do nocturnal asthma attacks influence sleep parameters and inflammatory markers? A cross-sectional population-based study.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- Relationship between Symptom Profiles and Endotypes among Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Latent Class Analysis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe identification of subgroups of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is critical to understand disease outcome and treatment response and ultimately develop optimal care strategies customized for each subgroup. In this sense, we aimed to perform a cluster analysis to identify subgroups of individuals with OSA based on clinical parameters in the Epidemiological Sleep Study of São Paulo city (EPISONO). We aimed to analyze whether or not subgroups remain after 8 years, since there is not any evidence showing if these subtypes of clinical presentation of OSA in the same population can change overtime.
methodsWe used data derived from EPISONO cohort, which was followed over 8 years after baseline evaluation. All individuals underwent polysomnography, answered questionnaires, and had their blood collected for biochemical examinations. OSA was defined according to AHI ≥ 15 events/h. Cluster analysis was performed using latent class analysis (LCA).
resultsOf the 1042 individuals in the EPISONO cohort, 68% agreed to participate in the follow-up study (n = 712), and 704 were included in the analysis. We were able to replicate the OSA 3-cluster solution observed in previous studies: disturbed sleep, minimally symptomatic and excessively sleepy in both baseline (36%, 45% and 19%, respectively) and follow-up studies (42%, 43%, and 15%, respectively). The optimal cluster solution for our sample based on Bayesian information criterion (BIC) was 2 cluster for baseline (disturbed sleep and excessively sleepy) and 3 clusters for follow-up (disturbed sleep, minimally symptomatic, and excessively sleepy). A total of 45% of the participants migrated clusters between the two evaluations (and the factor associated with this was a greater delta-AHI (B = - 0.033, df = 1, p = 0.003).
conclusionsThe results replicate and confirm previously identified clinical clusters in OSA which remain in the longitudinal analysis, with some percentage of migration between clusters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.