Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34984590›Full record

ReviewMolecular diversity2022

A review on synthetic account of 1,2,4-oxadiazoles as anti-infective agents.

Tejas M Dhameliya, Shrddhaba J Chudasma, Tanvi M Patel, Bhavarth P Dave

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diversity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Benzo[RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Radiolabeling and evaluation ofScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synthesis,Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Room Temperature Synthesis of Bioactive 1,2,4-Oxadiazoles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. ChemistrySelect · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tejas M DhameliyaL. M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 009, India. tejas.dhameliya@lmcp.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5336-9918
Shrddhaba J ChudasmaL. M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 009, India.
Tanvi M PatelL. M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 009, India.
Bhavarth P DaveL. M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 009, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the currently marketed drugs consist of heterocyclic scaffolds containing nitrogen and or oxygen as heteroatoms in their structures. Several research groups have synthesized diversely substituted 1,2,4-oxadiazoles as anti-infective agents having anti-bacterial, anti-viral, anti-leishmanial, etc. activities. For the first time, the present review article will provide the coverage of synthetic account of 1,2,4-oxadiazoles as anti-infective agents along with their potential for SAR, activity potential, promising target for mode of action. The efforts have been made to provide the chemical intuitions to the reader to design new chemical entity with potential of anti-infective activity. This review will mark the impact as the valuable, comprehensive and pioneered work along with the library of synthetic strategies for the organic and medicinal chemists for further refinement of 1,2,4-oxadiazole as anti-infective agents.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsOxadiazolesNitrogenOxygenStructure-Activity RelationshipAnti-Infective AgentsNitrogenOxadiazolesOxygen1,2,4-OxadiazolesAnti-bacterialAnti-infectiveAnti-malarialSynthesis

Identifiers

PMID34984590
PMCPMC8727175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.