Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34984498›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022

What is the rate of reinfection with different and difficult-to-treat bacteria after failed one-stage septic knee exchange?

Mustafa Akkaya, Georges Vles, Iman Godarzi Bakhtiari, Amir Sandiford, Jochen Salber, Thorsten Gehrke, Mustafa Citak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustafa AkkayaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Georges VlesDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hip Unit, Gasthuisberg, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Iman Godarzi BakhtiariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Amir SandifordDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southland Teaching Hospital, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Jochen SalberDepartment of Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
Thorsten GehrkeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.
Mustafa CitakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr. 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany. mcitak@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-7101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRe-operation after septic failure of a one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee is a highly challenging procedure with concerns over residual bone stock, soft tissues, and stability. The associated changes in microbiology in cases of reinfection are still largely unknown.

methodsA comprehensive analysis was performed of all patients treated at our tertiary institution between 2001 and 2017 who developed reinfection after a one-stage exchange for PJI of the knee. Prerequisites for inclusion were a certain diagnosis of PJI according to the ICM criteria and a minimum follow-up of three years. Data on comorbidities, previous surgical interventions, microbiological findings at the time of the initial one-stage exchange and at the time of reinfection, detection methods, and antibiotic resistance patterns were retrospectively studied.

resultsSixty-six patients were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Reinfection occurred after a mean time interval of 27.7 months (SD ± 33.9, range 1-165). Ten types of bacteria were found that were not present before the one-stage exchange. The causative pathogen remained identical in 22 patients (33%) and additional microorganisms were detected in ten patients (15%). Half of the reinfections were however due to (a) completely different microorganism(s). A significant increase in the number of PJIs on the basis of high-virulent (23 vs 30, p = 0.017) and difficult-to-treat bacteria (13 vs 24, p = 0.035) was found.

conclusionThe present study provides a novel insight into the microbiological changes following septic failure after one-stage exchange for PJI of the knee. A higher prevalence of more difficult-to-treat bacteria might increase the complexity of subsequent procedures. Also, a longer follow-up of these patients than previously suggested seems in order.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaHumansReinfectionReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMicrobiologyOne-stage exchangeProsthetic joint infectionRevisionTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.