ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2022
Supervised machine learning in the mass spectrometry laboratory: A tutorial.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Machine learning spectroscopy to advance computation and analysis.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Article
- Real-time glioblastoma tumor microenvironment assessment by SpiderMass for improved patient management.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- A Workflow for Meaningful Interpretation of Classification Results from Handheld Ambient Mass Spectrometry Analysis Probes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Mass-Suite: a novel open-source python package for high-resolution mass spectrometry data analysis.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- Clinical Pathology and the Data Science revolution.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the demand for laboratory testing by mass spectrometry increases, so does the need for automated methods for data analysis. Clinical mass spectrometry (MS) data is particularly well-suited for machine learning (ML) methods, which deal nicely with structured and discrete data elements. The alignment of these two fields offers a promising synergy that can be used to optimize workflows, improve result quality, and enhance our understanding of high-dimensional datasets and their inherent relationship with disease. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of publications that examine the capabilities of ML-based software in the context of chromatography and MS. However, given the historically distant nature between the fields of clinical chemistry and computer science, there is an opportunity to improve technological literacy of ML-based software within the clinical laboratory scientist community. To this end, we present a basic overview of ML and a tutorial of an ML-based experiment using a previously published MS dataset. The purpose of this paper is to describe the fundamental principles of supervised ML, outline the steps that are classically involved in an ML-based experiment, and discuss the purpose of good ML practice in the context of a binary MS classification problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.