ArticleJTCVS techniques2021
Tracheal reconstruction with nail grafts: A novel approach.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cryopreserved aortic graft patch repair of traumatic tracheal rupture defect: A case report.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
- Commentary: Great toenail grafts for tracheal reconstruction: Adopt it or kick it to the curb-your choice.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- Commentary: Go with the flow: The biophysical aspects of tracheal reconstructions.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe replacement of tracheal defects has been a challenge for investigators worldwide. We aimed to develop autologous nail grafts for the reconstruction of anterior tracheal defects.
methodsToenail grafts were implanted to improve the structural integrity of the trachea in patients with tracheal diseases. We clinically applied these grafts for the partial replacement of the cervical tracheal cartilage. Data on graft construction details, clinical outcomes, bronchoscopy, and 3-dimensional computed tomography examinations were collected.
resultsThe nail grafts were implanted in 4 patients. The trachea was successfully reconstructed in all cases. Bronchoscopy was performed 3 times to document healing: immediately, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. All grafts were well vascularized and incorporated into the tracheal wall and were covered with the respiratory mucosa. Three of the patients survived during the study period, but 1 patient died of progressive lung cancer.
conclusionsToenail grafts potentially may be used as an alternative strategy for the closure of small defects during tracheal reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.