ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021
The effect of HES130/0.4 sodium chloride solution on kidney function following early fluid resuscitation in shock patients.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy comparison of restrictive versus massive fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDoctors often use a small dose of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 sodium chloride solution in the emergency room; however, its effect on kidney function remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a small dose of HES130/0.4 sodium chloride solution on kidney function in shock patients during early fluid resuscitation.
methodsThis cohort study retrospectively analyzed the data of 129 shock patients requiring fluid resuscitation who had been admitted to the Emergency Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients were divided into the observation group (n=40) and control group (n=89) according to the type of fluid resuscitation. In relation to the fluid resuscitation treatment, the observation group was treated with crystalloid solution, while the control group was treated with crystalloid and HES130/0.4 sodium chloride solution. To further explore the effect of a small dose of HES130/0.4 sodium chloride solution, the patients were further divided into the following 4 groups based on the specific fluid administered: (I) the HES(+), lactated Ringer's (LR)(+) group (n=85); (II) the HES(+), LR(-) group (n=4); (III) the HES(-), LR(+) group (n=31); and (IV) the HES(-), LR(-) group (n=9). The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and changes in creatinine (CR) level after fluid resuscitation.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality rates between the observation and control groups (P=0.343). The CR levels of patients in the control and HES(+), LR(+) groups were reduced after fluid resuscitation (P=0.034; P=0.028). There was no significant change in patients' CR levels in the HES(+), LR(-) group after fluid resuscitation (P=0.999).
conclusionsAdministering a small dose of HES 130/0.4 sodium chloride in patients with shock does not appear to affect kidney function and in-hospital mortality; however, these findings should be considered exploratory, and further studies should be conducted to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.