Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34984069›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2021

Views of Schizophrenia Among Future Healthcare Professionals: Differences in Relation to Diagnostic Labelling, Causal Explanations, and Type of Academic Degree Program.

Lucia Sideli, Crocettarachele Sartorio, Laura Ferraro, Giuseppe Mannino, Serena Giunta, Francesca Giannone, Fabio Seminerio, M Valentina Barone, Giuseppe Maniaci, Simonetta Montana and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia SideliDepartment of Human Science, LUMSA University, Rome, Italy.
Crocettarachele SartorioSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Laura FerraroSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe ManninoDepartment of Law, LUMSA University, Palermo, Italy.
Serena GiuntaDepartment of Law, LUMSA University, Palermo, Italy.
Francesca GiannoneDepartment of Psychological and Educational Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Fabio SeminerioSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
M Valentina BaroneSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe ManiaciSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Simonetta MontanaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Fulvio MarcheseSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Daniele La BarberaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Caterina La CasciaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStereotyped beliefs about schizophrenia are well-established in the society and relatively common among healthcare professionals and students. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions about the causes, treatment, and outcome of schizophrenia among healthcare students.

methodUndergraduate nursing and psychology students completed selected items of the Opinion on Mental Illness Questionnaire after reading a clinical vignette of undiagnosed schizophrenia.

resultsStudents who labelled the description as schizophrenia were more pessimistic regarding full recovery from the disorder. Those who acknowledged greater relevance to biogenetic risk factors were more convinced of the efficacy of medications. Respondents' opinions on the efficacy of psychological interventions were more positive among psychology students than among nursing students.

conclusionsThe study confirmed the associations of schizophrenia labelling with prognostic pessimism and beliefs about the efficacy of pharmacological treatment among future healthcare professionals. Students' opinions were less influenced by differences between academic degree programs. Information about current recovery rate and comprehensive care for schizophrenia may support future healthcare professionals in the relationship and the clinical management of PWS.

Indexed as

healthcare studentsmultidisciplinary careopinionsrecoveryschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID34984069
PMCPMC8696287
OpenAlexW4206164519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.