ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021
Satisfaction with Public Hospital Reform and Associated Factors Among Medical Staff: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Wuhan, China.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Professional Compromise and Its Association with Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Satisfaction Among Physicians in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Analysis of factors influencing the job satisfaction of medical staff in tertiary public hospitals, China: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether medical staff are satisfied with public hospital reform and its influencing factors.
methodsA sample of 2000 medical staff from 13 public hospitals in Wuhan were surveyed with a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive analysis and binary logistic regression were conducted to identify the status of the medical staff's attitude to the reform and the influencing factors.
resultsA total of 61.4% of medical staff satisfied with the reform and the main reason was the promotion of their practice environment and social status brought by the reform. The logistic regression model indicated that the attitude to the reform of medical staff was positively associated with 9-11 hours of daily working time (OR = 2.373, as compared with less than 8 hours), higher income (OR = 1.966), the occupation of the nurse and medical technician (OR = 2.196-1.464 as compared with the doctor) as well as negative attitude towards the effectiveness of reform (OR = 3.676).
conclusionMore than half of medical staff are satisfied with the public hospital reform, while some still hold negative attitude to the reform because of the extra working hours, low salary and high expectations due to professional characteristics and high input costs (education and time). Thus, in the current epidemic of prevention and control, more attention should be paid to the work pressure and enthusiasm of medical personnel. Administrators should pay attention to increasing income and improving the practicing environment and social status to prevent medical staff from treating reforms negatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.