Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983971›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2022

Molecular mechanisms of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance.

Maximilian H Fitz-James, Giacomo Cavalli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 278 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
278citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

278 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sex-biased metabolic programming in Drosophila via paternal white rice exposure.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. On the state of chromatin in mammalian sperm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

218 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maximilian H Fitz-JamesInstitute of Human Genetics, CNRS and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-5887
Giacomo CavalliInstitute of Human Genetics, CNRS and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. giacomo.cavalli@igh.cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-3469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence indicates that non-DNA sequence-based epigenetic information can be inherited across several generations in organisms ranging from yeast to plants to humans. This raises the possibility of heritable 'epimutations' contributing to heritable phenotypic variation and thus to evolution. Recent work has shed light on both the signals that underpin these epimutations, including DNA methylation, histone modifications and non-coding RNAs, and the mechanisms by which they are transmitted across generations at the molecular level. These mechanisms can vary greatly among species and have a more limited effect in mammals than in plants and other animal species. Nevertheless, common principles are emerging, with transmission occurring either via direct replicative mechanisms or indirect reconstruction of the signal in subsequent generations. As these processes become clearer we continue to improve our understanding of the distinctive features and relative contribution of DNA sequence and epigenetic variation to heritable differences in phenotype.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticInheritance PatternsAnimalsDatabases, GeneticDNA MethylationEpigenomicsMammals

Identifiers

PMID34983971
PMCPMC7619059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.