Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983847›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Proteomics of isolated sieve tubes from

Yan Liu, Viktoriya V Vasina, Max E Kraner, Winfried S Peters, Uwe Sonnewald, Michael Knoblauch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Phloem Sap Composition: What Have We Learnt from Metabolomics?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan LiuSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99154.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-8695
Viktoriya V VasinaSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99154.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-8922
Max E KranerDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1733-1909
Winfried S PetersSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99154.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-1497
Uwe SonnewaldDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1835-5339
Michael KnoblauchSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99154; knoblauch@wsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0391-9891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symplasmicly connected cells called sieve elements form a network of tubes in the phloem of vascular plants. Sieve elements have essential functions as they provide routes for photoassimilate distribution, the exchange of developmental signals, and the coordination of defense responses. Nonetheless, they are the least understood main type of plant cells. They are extremely sensitive, possess a reduced endomembrane system without Golgi apparatus, and lack nuclei and translation machineries, so that transcriptomics and similar techniques cannot be applied. Moreover, the analysis of phloem exudates as a proxy for sieve element composition is marred by methodological problems. We developed a simple protocol for the isolation of sieve elements from leaves and stems of

Indexed as

ProteomicsEndoplasmic ReticulumNicotianaPlant CellsPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant Stemsphloemproteomicssieve elementsieve tube endomembrane system

Identifiers

PMID34983847
PMCPMC8740716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.