Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983845›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Inverting the structure-property map of truss metamaterials by deep learning.

Jan-Hendrik Bastek, Siddhant Kumar, Bastian Telgen, Raphaël N Glaesener, Dennis M Kochmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Highly Efficient Discovery of 3D Mechanical Metamaterials via Monte Carlo Tree Search.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. De Novo Atomistic Discovery of Disordered Mechanical Metamaterials by Machine Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan-Hendrik BastekMechanics & Materials Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3343-1977
Siddhant KumarDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-8641
Bastian TelgenMechanics & Materials Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Raphaël N GlaesenerMechanics & Materials Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4404-2910
Dennis M KochmannMechanics & Materials Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; dmk@ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-9112-6615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspired by crystallography, the periodic assembly of trusses into architected materials has enjoyed popularity for more than a decade and produced countless cellular structures with beneficial mechanical properties. Despite the successful and steady enrichment of the truss design space, the inverse design has remained a challenge: While predicting effective truss properties is now commonplace, efficiently identifying architectures that have homogeneous or spatially varying target properties has remained a roadblock to applications from lightweight structures to biomimetic implants. To overcome this gap, we propose a deep-learning framework, which combines neural networks with enforced physical constraints, to predict truss architectures with fully tailored anisotropic stiffness. Trained on millions of unit cells, it covers an enormous design space of topologically distinct truss lattices and accurately identifies architectures matching previously unseen stiffness responses. We demonstrate the application to patient-specific bone implants matching clinical stiffness data, and we discuss the extension to spatially graded cellular structures with locally optimal properties.

Indexed as

Construction MaterialsDeep LearningModels, Theoreticaldeep learninginverse designmetamaterialstiffnesstruss

Identifiers

PMID34983845
PMCPMC8740766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.