Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983835›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

A neural surveyor to map touch on the body.

Luke E Miller, Cécile Fabio, Malika Azaroual, Dollyane Muret, Robert J van Beers, Alessandro Farnè, W Pieter Medendorp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Repetitive somatosensory stimulation shrinks the body image.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Trial
  2. The Spatial Coding of Touch Is Defined in Intrinsic, Limb-Specific Coordinates: An EEG Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luke E MillerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands; Luke.Miller@donders.ru.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7865-881X
Cécile FabioIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team - ImpAct, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS U5292, Bron 69500, France.
Malika AzaroualIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team - ImpAct, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS U5292, Bron 69500, France.
Dollyane MuretInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2626-654X
Robert J van BeersDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-8918
Alessandro FarnèIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team - ImpAct, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS U5292, Bron 69500, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5769-3491
W Pieter MedendorpDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9615-4220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perhaps the most recognizable sensory map in all of neuroscience is the somatosensory homunculus. Although it seems straightforward, this simple representation belies the complex link between an activation in a somatotopic map and the associated touch location on the body. Any isolated activation is spatially ambiguous without a neural decoder that can read its position within the entire map, but how this is computed by neural networks is unknown. We propose that the somatosensory system implements multilateration, a common computation used by surveying and global positioning systems to localize objects. Specifically, to decode touch location on the body, multilateration estimates the relative distance between the afferent input and the boundaries of a body part (e.g., the joints of a limb). We show that a simple feedforward neural network, which captures several fundamental receptive field properties of cortical somatosensory neurons, can implement a Bayes-optimal multilateral computation. Simulations demonstrated that this decoder produced a pattern of localization variability between two boundaries that was unique to multilateration. Finally, we identify this computational signature of multilateration in actual psychophysical experiments, suggesting that it is a candidate computational mechanism underlying tactile localization.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAdultAnimalsBayes TheoremBrain MappingFemaleHumansMiceModels, NeurologicalNeuronsPhysical StimulationSomatosensory CortexTouchTouch PerceptionYoung Adultcomputationneural networksomatosensorytactile localization

Identifiers

PMID34983835
PMCPMC8740579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.