Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983834›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Tsubasa Kawai, Kyosuke Shibata, Ryosuke Akahoshi, Shunsaku Nishiuchi, Hirokazu Takahashi, Mikio Nakazono, Takaaki Kojima, Misuzu Nosaka-Takahashi, Yutaka Sato, Atsushi Toyoda and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Combination ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. OUR1/OsbZIP1-Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tsubasa KawaiGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Kyosuke ShibataGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Ryosuke AkahoshiGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Shunsaku NishiuchiGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6571-4010
Hirokazu TakahashiGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Mikio NakazonoGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7119-2052
Takaaki KojimaGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7282-121X
Misuzu Nosaka-TakahashiNational Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.
Yutaka SatoNational Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0751-6611
Atsushi ToyodaNational Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0728-7548
Nonawin Lucob-AgustinGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7374-9587
Mana Kano-NakataInternational Center for Research and Education in Agriculture, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Roel R SuraltaCrop Biotechnology Center, Philippine Rice Research Institute, Science City of Muñoz 3119, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-0308
Jonathan M NionesGenetic Resource Division, Philippine Rice Research Institute, Science City of Muñoz 3119, Philippines.
Yinglong ChenThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, and School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0798-8683
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, and School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6097-4235
Akira YamauchiGraduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Yoshiaki InukaiInternational Center for Research and Education in Agriculture, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan; inukaiy@agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-2932-3236
Nagoya University · JPThe University of Western Australia · AUNational Institute of Genetics · JPPhilippine Rice Research Institute · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a plastic root system is essential for stable crop production under variable environments. Rice plants have two types of lateral roots (LRs): S-type (short and thin) and L-type (long, thick, and capable of further branching). LR types are determined at the primordium stage, with a larger primordium size in L-types than S-types. Despite the importance of LR types for rice adaptability to variable water conditions, molecular mechanisms underlying the primordium size control of LRs are unknown. Here, we show that two

Indexed as

Genes, HomeoboxArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantHomeodomain ProteinsMeristemOryzaPlant ProteinsPlant RootsPlants, Genetically ModifiedTranscriptomeArabidopsis ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsPlant ProteinsWUSCHEL protein, Arabidopsisdevelopmental plasticitylateral root primordiumOryza sativa L.root developmentWUSCHEL-related homeobox genes

Identifiers

PMID34983834
PMCPMC8740593
OpenAlexW4206329683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.