Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983789›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Metabolomic Biomarkers in Blood Samples Identify Cancers in a Mixed Population of Patients with Nonspecific Symptoms.

James R Larkin, Susan Anthony, Vanessa A Johanssen, Tianrong Yeo, Megan Sealey, Abi G Yates, Claire Friedemann Smith, Timothy D W Claridge, Brian D Nicholson, Julie-Ann Moreland and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Metabolomics-driven discovery of therapeutic targets for cancer cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James R LarkinMedical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-8447
Susan AnthonyDepartment of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Vanessa A JohanssenMedical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1791-5912
Tianrong YeoDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3648-0953
Megan SealeyDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abi G YatesDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Claire Friedemann SmithNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9934-5882
Timothy D W ClaridgeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5583-6460
Brian D NicholsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Julie-Ann MorelandDepartment of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9880-4247
Fergus GleesonMedical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nicola R SibsonMedical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1211-2766
Daniel C AnthonyDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1380-6655
Fay ProbertDepartment of Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16945Cancer Research UK A16466Cancer Research UK C5255/A15935Cancer Research UK C5255/A16466Cancer Research UK C5255/A18085Department of Health MIC-2018-018Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly diagnosis of cancer is critical for improving patient outcomes, but cancers may be hard to diagnose if patients present with nonspecific signs and symptoms. We have previously shown that nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics analysis can detect cancer in animal models and distinguish between differing metastatic disease burdens. Here, we hypothesized that biomarkers within the blood metabolome could identify cancers within a mixed population of patients referred from primary care with nonspecific symptoms, the so-called "low-risk, but not no-risk" patient group, as well as distinguishing between those with and without metastatic disease. EXPERIMENTAL

designPatients (n = 304 comprising modeling, n = 192, and test, n = 92) were recruited from 2017 to 2018 from the Oxfordshire Suspected CANcer (SCAN) pathway, a multidisciplinary diagnostic center (MDC) referral pathway for patients with nonspecific signs and symptoms. Blood was collected and analyzed by NMR metabolomics. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminatory analysis (OPLS-DA) models separated patients, based upon diagnoses received from the MDC assessment, within 62 days of initial appointment.

resultsArea under the ROC curve for identifying patients with solid tumors in the independent test set was 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.95]. Maximum sensitivity and specificity were 94% (95% CI: 73-99) and 82% (95% CI: 75-87), respectively. We could also identify patients with metastatic disease in the cohort of patients with cancer with sensitivity and specificity of 94% (95% CI: 72-99) and 88% (95% CI: 53-98), respectively.

conclusionsFor a mixed group of patients referred from primary care with nonspecific signs and symptoms, NMR-based metabolomics can assist their diagnosis, and may differentiate both those with malignancies and those with and without metastatic disease. See related commentary by Van Tine and Lyssiotis, p. 1477.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsNeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34983789
PMCPMC7613224
OpenAlexW4206006610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.