Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983677›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2022

PET/CT variants and pitfalls in malignant melanoma.

Nicolas Aide, Amir Iravani, Kevin Prigent, Diane Kottler, Ramin Alipour, Rodney J Hicks

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. IsCancers · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Perspectives on joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards for [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas AidePET Centre, University Hospital, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France. nicolasaide0@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-0847
Amir IravaniMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, USA.
Kevin PrigentPET Centre, University Hospital, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.
Diane KottlerDermatology Department, University Hospital, Caen, France.
Ramin AlipourPeter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Rodney J HicksPeter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie · FRMallinckrodt (United States) · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversité de Caen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

COVID-19MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsSARS-CoV-2Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsCOVID19FDGImmunotherapyMelanomaPETPET technologyPitfalls, variants

Identifiers

PMID34983677
PMCPMC8724662
OpenAlexW4206629495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.