Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983659›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2022

Generating comprehensive functioning and disability data worldwide: development process, data analyses strategy and reliability of the WHO and World Bank Model Disability Survey.

Carla Sabariego, Carolina Fellinghauer, Lindsay Lee, Kaloyan Kamenov, Aleksandra Posarac, Jerome Bickenbach, Nenad Kostanjsek, Somnath Chatterji, Alarcos Cieza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carla SabariegoDepartment of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Carolina FellinghauerSensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lindsay LeeSensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kaloyan KamenovSensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. kamenovk@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-6186
Aleksandra PosaracEast Africa Human Development. The World Bank, Washington, DC, 22304, USA.
Jerome BickenbachDepartment of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Nenad KostanjsekDepartment of Classifications and Terminologies, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Somnath ChatterjiDepartment of Data and Analytics, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alarcos CiezaSensory Functions, Disability and Rehabilitation, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on functioning and disability collected at population level is essential to complement mortality and morbidity, to estimate rehabilitation needs of countries and regions and to monitor the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The objective of this paper is to briefly report the development process of the WHO Model Disability Survey, its data analysis strategy as well as its reliability and ability to measure low to high levels of functioning and disability across countries.

methodsThe development process is described in detail, and a secondary analysis using Rasch methods is conducted to report reliability and targeting using data from eight national and two regional implementations of the survey.

resultsThe currently available versions of the Model Disability Survey are presented. The survey has good to very good internal reliability and good targeting in all included countries.

conclusionThe participatory and evidence-based development, consideration of the expertise of stakeholders, the availability of previously developed ICF-based surveys, and WHO tools targeting functioning and disability are reflected in its good to very good psychometric properties. The survey has been implemented to date in Afghanistan, Cameroon, Chile, Costa Rica, India, Laos, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Tajikistan, and is used to inform policy-making, to monitor the CRPD and SDGs and to plan the delivery of rehabilitation services.

Indexed as

DisabilityFunctioningInternational classification of functioning, disability and healthModel disability surveyRehabilitationReliability

Identifiers

PMID34983659
PMCPMC8725367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.