Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983569›Full record

ReviewParticle and fibre toxicology2022

Digital research data: from analysis of existing standards to a scientific foundation for a modular metadata schema in nanosafety.

Linda Elberskirch, Kunigunde Binder, Norbert Riefler, Adriana Sofranko, Julia Liebing, Christian Bonatto Minella, Lutz Mädler, Matthias Razum, Christoph van Thriel, Klaus Unfried and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linda Elberskirch *INM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Campus D2 2, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Kunigunde Binder *FIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76133, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Norbert RieflerIWT - Leibniz-Institut für Werkstofforientierte Technologien, Badgasteiner Str. 3, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Adriana SofrankoIUF - Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Auf'm Hennekamp 50, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Julia LiebingIfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Christian Bonatto MinellaFIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76133, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Lutz MädlerIWT - Leibniz-Institut für Werkstofforientierte Technologien, Badgasteiner Str. 3, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Matthias RazumFIZ Karlsruhe - Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76133, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Christoph van ThrielIfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Klaus UnfriedIUF - Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Auf'm Hennekamp 50, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Roel P F SchinsIUF - Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Auf'm Hennekamp 50, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Annette KraegelohINM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Campus D2 2, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany. annette.kraegeloh@leibniz-inm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-5442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing the safety of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is an interdisciplinary and complex process producing huge amounts of information and data. To make such data and metadata reusable for researchers, manufacturers, and regulatory authorities, there is an urgent need to record and provide this information in a structured, harmonized, and digitized way.

resultsThis study aimed to identify appropriate description standards and quality criteria for the special use in nanosafety. There are many existing standards and guidelines designed for collecting data and metadata, ranging from regulatory guidelines to specific databases. Most of them are incomplete or not specifically designed for ENM research. However, by merging the content of several existing standards and guidelines, a basic catalogue of descriptive information and quality criteria was generated. In an iterative process, our interdisciplinary team identified deficits and added missing information into a comprehensive schema. Subsequently, this overview was externally evaluated by a panel of experts during a workshop. This whole process resulted in a minimum information table (MIT), specifying necessary minimum information to be provided along with experimental results on effects of ENMs in the biological context in a flexible and modular manner. The MIT is divided into six modules: general information, material information, biological model information, exposure information, endpoint read out information and analysis and statistics. These modules are further partitioned into module subdivisions serving to include more detailed information. A comparison with existing ontologies, which also aim to electronically collect data and metadata on nanosafety studies, showed that the newly developed MIT exhibits a higher level of detail compared to those existing schemas, making it more usable to prevent gaps in the communication of information.

conclusionImplementing the requirements of the MIT into e.g., electronic lab notebooks (ELNs) would make the collection of all necessary data and metadata a daily routine and thereby would improve the reproducibility and reusability of experiments. Furthermore, this approach is particularly beneficial regarding the rapidly expanding developments and applications of novel non-animal alternative testing methods.

Indexed as

MetadataResearch DesignDatabases, FactualReproducibility of ResultsData re-useMetadataMinimum information standardNanomaterialNanoparticleQuality criteriaResearch data managementToxicology

Identifiers

PMID34983569
PMCPMC8728981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.