Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983548›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2022

Switching to nanonutrients for sustaining agroecosystems and environment: the challenges and benefits in moving up from ionic to particle feeding.

Ajay Kumar Bhardwaj, Geeta Arya, Raj Kumar, Lamy Hamed, Hadi Pirasteh-Anosheh, Poonam Jasrotia, Prem Lal Kashyap, Gyanendra Pratap Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A NovelPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ajay Kumar BhardwajICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Geeta AryaICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Raj KumarICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Lamy HamedSoil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.
Hadi Pirasteh-AnoshehNational Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Yazd, 8917357676, Iran.
Poonam JasrotiaICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Prem Lal KashyapICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Gyanendra Pratap SinghICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India. director.iiwbr@icar.gov.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide agricultural enterprise is facing immense pressure to intensify to feed the world's increasing population while the resources are dwindling. Fertilizers which are deemed as indispensable inputs for food, fodder, and fuel production now also represent the dark side of the intensive food production system. With most crop production systems focused on increasing the quantity of produce, indiscriminate use of fertilizers has created havoc for the environment and damaged the fiber of the biogeosphere. Deteriorated nutritional quality of food and contribution to impaired ecosystem services are the major limiting factors in the further growth of the fertilizer sector. Nanotechnology in agriculture has come up as a better and seemingly sustainable solution to meet production targets as well as maintaining the environmental quality by use of less quantity of raw materials and active ingredients, increased nutrient use-efficiency by plants, and decreased environmental losses of nutrients. However, the use of nanofertilizers has so far been limited largely to controlled environments of laboratories, greenhouses, and institutional research experiments; production and availability on large scale are still lagging yet catching up fast. Despite perceivable advantages, the use of nanofertilizers is many times debated for adoption at a large scale. The scenario is gradually changing, worldwide, towards the use of nanofertilizers, especially macronutrients like nitrogen (e.g. market release of nano-urea to replace conventional urea in South Asia), to arrest environmental degradation and uphold vital ecosystem services which are in critical condition. This review offers a discussion on the purpose with which the nanofertilizers took shape, the benefits which can be achieved, and the challenges which nanofertilizers face for further development and real-world use, substantiated with the significant pieces of scientific evidence available so far.

Indexed as

EcosystemFertilizersNanoparticlesAgricultureCrops, AgriculturalNanotechnologyFertilizersAgricultureControlled releaseFertilizersNanotechnologyPlant nutrientsUse efficiency

Identifiers

PMID34983548
PMCPMC8728941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.