Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983540›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Naturally acquired antibody response to a Plasmodium falciparum chimeric vaccine candidate GMZ2.6c and its components (MSP-3, GLURP, and Pfs48/45) in individuals living in Brazilian malaria-endemic areas.

Barbara Oliveira Baptista, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Souza, Evelyn Kety Pratt Riccio, Cesare Bianco-Junior, Paulo Renato Rivas Totino, João Hermínio Martins da Silva, Michael Theisen, Susheel Kumar Singh, Linda Eva Amoah, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibody Responses to the ConservedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Host-parasite interactions duringFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Barbara Oliveira BaptistaLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz Lopes de SouzaLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Evelyn Kety Pratt RiccioLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cesare Bianco-JuniorLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paulo Renato Rivas TotinoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
João Hermínio Martins da SilvaDepartamento de Bioinformática, Fiocruz, Ceará, Brazil.
Michael TheisenCentre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susheel Kumar SinghCentre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen and Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Linda Eva AmoahImmunology Department, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Marcelo Ribeiro-AlvesLaboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST e AIDS, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo Medeiros SouzaLaboratório de Doenças Infecciosas na Amazônia Ocidental, Universidade Federal do Acre, Acre, Brazil.
Josué Costa Lima-JuniorLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, IOC, Rio de Janeiro, Fiocruz, Brazil.
Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-RibeiroLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lilian Rose Pratt-RiccioLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. riccio@ioc.fiocruz.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4002-5889
Ministério da Saúde · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKInstituto Evandro Chagas · BRUniversidade Federal do Acre · BRUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz VPPCB-007-FIO-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe GMZ2.6c malaria vaccine candidate is a multi-stage Plasmodium falciparum chimeric protein which contains a fragment of the sexual-stage Pfs48/45-6C protein genetically fused to GMZ2, a fusion protein of GLURP and MSP-3, that has been shown to be well tolerated, safe and immunogenic in clinical trials performed in a malaria-endemic area of Africa. However, there is no data available on the antigenicity or immunogenicity of GMZ2.6c in humans. Considering that circulating parasites can be genetically distinct in different malaria-endemic areas and that host genetic factors can influence the immune response to vaccine antigens, it is important to verify the antigenicity, immunogenicity and the possibility of associated protection in individuals living in malaria-endemic areas with different epidemiological scenarios. Herein, the profile of antibody response against GMZ2.6c and its components (MSP-3, GLURP and Pfs48/45) in residents of the Brazilian Amazon naturally exposed to malaria, in areas with different levels of transmission, was evaluated.

methodsThis study was performed using serum samples from 352 individuals from Cruzeiro do Sul and Mâncio Lima, in the state of Acre, and Guajará, in the state of Amazonas. Specific IgG, IgM, IgA and IgE antibodies and IgG subclasses were detected by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.

resultsThe results showed that GMZ2.6c protein was widely recognized by naturally acquired antibodies from individuals of the Brazilian endemic areas with different levels of transmission. The higher prevalence of individuals with antibodies against GMZ2.6c when compared to its individual components may suggest an additive effect of GLURP, MSP-3, and Pfs48/45 when inserted in a same construct. Furthermore, naturally malaria-exposed individuals predominantly had IgG1 and IgG3 cytophilic anti-GMZ2.6c antibodies, an important fact considering that the acquisition of anti-malaria protective immunity results from a delicate balance between cytophilic/non-cytophilic antibodies. Interestingly, anti-GMZ2.6c antibodies seem to increase with exposure to malaria infection and may contribute to parasite immunity.

conclusionsThe data showed that GMZ2.6c protein is widely recognized by naturally acquired antibodies from individuals living in malaria-endemic areas in Brazil and that these may contribute to parasite immunity. These data highlight the importance of GMZ2.6c as a candidate for an anti-malarial vaccine.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAdolescentAdultAntigens, ProtozoanBrazilFemaleHumansMalaria VaccinesMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsYoung AdultAntigens, Protozoanglutamate-rich protein, PlasmodiumGMZ2 vaccineMalaria VaccinesMembrane GlycoproteinsMSP3 protein, Plasmodium falciparum (181-276)Peptide Fragmentspfs48-45 protein, Plasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntibodiesGMZ2.6cImmune responseMalariaPlasmodium falciparumVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34983540
PMCPMC8729018
OpenAlexW4206187484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.