ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
Comparing machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic models in COVID-19 infection that predict severity: a systematic review.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Intensive Care Units Mortality and Length of Stay: A 11-Year Retrospective Study in Hong Kong Public Hospitals.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Integrating Host Genetics and Clinical Setting in Machine Learning Models: Predicting COVID-19 Prognosis for Healthcare Decision-Making (The FeMiNa Study).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of intensive care unit admission in COVID-19 patients presenting with mild respiratory failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the correlates of COVID-19 vaccination inequity: a global analysis using machine learning from a health economic lens.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Effects of environment and globalization on the double and triple burdens of infection symptoms among under-five children across low-middle income countries using machine learning algorithms.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Network Selection and Optimized Information Fusion for Enhanced COVID-19 Detection: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Socioeconomic, demographic and environmental factors associated with under-five mortality among children in Kenya: analysis of the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- An investigation into the impact of temporality on COVID-19 infection and mortality predictions: new perspective based on Shapley Values.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Predicting total healthcare demand using machine learning: separate and combined analysis of predisposing, enabling, and need factors.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Explore the factors related to the death of offspring under age five and appraise the hazard of child mortality using machine learning techniques in Bangladesh.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Lymphocyte Inhibition Mechanisms and Immune Checkpoints in COVID-19: Insights into Prognostic Markers and Disease Severity.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Predictive modelling and identification of critical variables of mortality risk in COVID-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Machine learning in infectious diseases: potential applications and limitations.Annals of medicine · 2024Review
- Establishing a differential diagnosis model between primary membranous nephropathy and non-primary membranous nephropathy by machine learning algorithms.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of COVID-19 mortality risk in chronic kidney disease patients using multiple machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of childbearing tendency in women on the verge of marriage using machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) hospitalized patients are always at risk of death. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can be used as a potential solution for predicting mortality in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. So, our study aimed to compare several ML algorithms to predict the COVID-19 mortality using the patient's data at the first time of admission and choose the best performing algorithm as a predictive tool for decision-making.
methodsIn this study, after feature selection, based on the confirmed predictors, information about 1500 eligible patients (1386 survivors and 144 deaths) obtained from the registry of Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital, Abadan city, Iran, was extracted. Afterwards, several ML algorithms were trained to predict COVID-19 mortality. Finally, to assess the models' performance, the metrics derived from the confusion matrix were calculated.
resultsThe study participants were 1500 patients; the number of men was found to be higher than that of women (836 vs. 664) and the median age was 57.25 years old (interquartile 18-100). After performing the feature selection, out of 38 features, dyspnea, ICU admission, and oxygen therapy were found as the top three predictors. Smoking, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count were found to be the three lowest predictors of COVID-19 mortality. Experimental results demonstrated that random forest (RF) had better performance than other ML algorithms with accuracy, sensitivity, precision, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of 95.03%, 90.70%, 94.23%, 95.10%, and 99.02%, respectively.
conclusionIt was found that ML enables a reasonable level of accuracy in predicting the COVID-19 mortality. Therefore, ML-based predictive models, particularly the RF algorithm, potentially facilitate identifying the patients who are at high risk of mortality and inform proper interventions by the clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.