Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983481›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Student well-being during dedicated preparation for USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 exams.

Sean Tackett, Maniraj Jeyaraju, Jesse Moore, Alice Hudder, Sandra Yingling, Yoon Soo Park, Mark Grichanik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why the Delay? Factors Predicting Step 1 Delay.Medical science educator · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Medical education online · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sean TackettJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 5200 Eastern Ave, MFL Center Tower Suite 2300, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. stacket1@jhmi.edu.
Maniraj JeyarajuUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Jesse MooreLarner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.
Alice HudderLake Erie, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, USA.
Sandra YinglingUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Yoon Soo ParkHarvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Mark GrichanikDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly all U.S. medical students engage in a 4-8 week period of intense preparation for their first-level licensure exams, termed a "dedicated preparation period" (DPP). It is widely assumed that student well-being is harmed during DPPs, but evidence is limited. This study characterized students' physical, intellectual, emotional, and social well-being during DPPs.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey sent electronically to all second-year students at four U.S. medical schools after each school's respective DPP for USMLE Step 1 or COMLEX Level 1 in 2019. Survey items assessed DPP characteristics, cost of resources, and perceived financial strain as predictors for 18 outcomes measured by items with Likert-type response options. Open-ended responses on DPPs' influence underwent thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 314/750 (42%) students completed surveys. DPPs lasted a median of 7 weeks (IQR 6-8 weeks), and students spent 70 h/week (IQR 56-80 h/week) studying. A total of 62 (20%) reported experiencing a significant life event that impacted their ability to study during their DPPs. Most reported 2 outcomes improved: medical knowledge base (95%) and confidence in ability to care for patients (56%). Most reported 9 outcomes worsened, including overall quality of life (72%), feeling burned out (77%), and personal anxiety (81%). A total of 25% reported paying for preparation materials strained their finances. Greater perceived financial strain was associated with worsening 11 outcomes, with reported amount spent associated with worsening 2 outcomes. Themes from student descriptions of how DPPs for first-level exams influenced them included (1) opportunity for synthesis of medical knowledge, (2) exercise of endurance and self-discipline required for professional practice, (3) dissonance among exam preparation resource content, formal curriculum, and professional values, (4) isolation, deprivation, and anguish from competing for the highest possible score, and (5) effects on well-being after DPPs.

conclusionsDPPs are currently experienced by many students as a period of personal and social deprivation, which may be worsened by perceived financial stress more than the amount of money they spend on preparation materials. DPPs should be considered as a target for reform as medical educators attempt to prevent student suffering and enhance their well-being.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementHumansLicensure, MedicalQuality of LifeSocial DeprivationCOMLEX level 1Medical studentsUSMLE step 1Well-being

Identifiers

PMID34983481
PMCPMC8728922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.