Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983477›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Multiple stakeholder perspectives of factors influencing differential outcomes for ethnic minority students on health and social care placements: a qualitative exploration.

Julie Nightingale, Jackie Parkin, Pete Nelson, Shirley Masterson-Ng, Jacqui Brewster, Temitope Labinjo, Deborah Amoakoh, David Lomas, Ifrah Salih, Deborah Harrop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julie NightingaleDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. J.Nightingale@shu.ac.uk.
Jackie ParkinDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Pete NelsonDepartment of Social Work, Social Care and Community Studies, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Shirley Masterson-NgDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Jacqui BrewsterDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Temitope LabinjoDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Deborah AmoakohDepartment of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
David LomasDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Ifrah SalihDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Deborah HarropDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite considerable efforts there continues to be a degree awarding gap within the United Kingdom (UK) between the proportion of White British students receiving higher classifications, compared to ethnic minority UK-domiciled students. Practice placement elements constitute approximately 50% of most health and social care programmes, yet surprisingly little research exists related to the factors which may contribute to ethnic minority student placement outcomes or experiences. This study bridges this evidence gap by exploring factors influencing differential placement outcomes of ethnic minority students from the perspectives of key stakeholders.

methodsThe study followed a descriptive qualitative research design and was multi-disciplinary, with participants drawn from across nursing, midwifery, social work and the allied health professions. Participants from four stakeholder categories (ethnic minority students, academic staff, placement educators and student union advisors) were invited to join separate focus groups. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed and analysed thematically.

resultsTen separate focus groups [n = 66] yielded three primary themes: 1) recognition, which highlighted stakeholder perceptions of the issues [sub-themes: acknowledging concerns; cultural norms; challenging environments]; 2) the lived experience, which primarily captured ethnic minority student perspectives [sub-themes: problematising language and stereotyping, and being treated differently]; 3) surviving not thriving, which outlines the consequences of the lived experience [sub-themes: withdrawing mentally, feeling like an alien].

conclusionThis study presents a rich exploration of the factors affecting differential outcomes of ethnic minority students on practice placements through the lens of four different stakeholder groups. To our knowledge this is the first study in which this comprehensive approach has been taken to enable multiple viewpoints to be accessed across a wide range of health and social care professions. The issues and challenges raised appear to be common to most if not all of these disciplines. This study highlights the urgent need to value and support our ethnic minority students to remove the barriers they face in their practice learning settings. This is a monumental challenge and requires both individuals and organisations to step up and take collective responsibility.

Indexed as

Ethnic and Racial MinoritiesEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsQualitative ResearchSocial SupportStudentsAllied health professionsBAMEBMEClinical placementsEthnicityMidwiferyNursingSocial workStudent experience

Identifiers

PMID34983477
PMCPMC8729071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.