Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983447›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Containment and therapeutic relationships in acute psychiatric care spaces: the symbolic dimensions of doors.

Evdokia Missouridou, Evangelos C Fradelos, Emmanouel Kritsiotakis, Polyxeni Mangoulia, Eirini Segredou, Ioanna V Papathanasiou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring the lived experience of receiving mental health crisis care at emergency departments, crisis phone lines and crisis care alternatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evdokia MissouridouDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Caring Professions, University of West Attica, Saint Spiridonos 12243, Egaleo, Athens, Greece. emis@uniwa.gr.
Evangelos C FradelosCommunity Nursing Lab, Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Emmanouel KritsiotakisDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Caring Professions, University of West Attica, Saint Spiridonos 12243, Egaleo, Athens, Greece.
Polyxeni MangouliaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Caring Professions, University of West Attica, Saint Spiridonos 12243, Egaleo, Athens, Greece.
Eirini SegredouAlcohol Treatment Unit, Psychiatric Hospital of Attica, Chaidari, Greece.
Ioanna V PapathanasiouCommunity Nursing Lab, Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
University of West Attica · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing trend of door locking practices in acute psychiatric care. The aim of the present study was to illuminate the symbolic dimensions of doors in Greek mental health nurses' experiences of open and locked working spaces.

resultsA sequential mixed-method designexplored the experiences of nurses working in both open and locked psychiatric acute care units. Participants experiences revealed four types of doors related to the quality of recovery-oriented care: (a) the open door, (b) the invisible door, (c) the restraining door, and (d) the revolving door. Open doors and permeable spacesgenerated trust and facilitated the diffusion of tension and the necessary perception of feeling safe in order to be involved in therapeutic engagement. When the locked unit was experienced as a caring environment, the locked doors appeared to be "invisible". The restraining doors symbolized loss of control, social distance and stigma echoing the consequences of restrictingpeople's crucial control over spaceduring the COVID-19 pandemicin relation toviolence within families, groups and communities. The revolving door (service users' abscondence/re-admission) symbolised the rejection of the offered therapeutic environment and was a source of indignation and compassion fatigue in both open and locked spaces attributed to internal structural acute care characteristics (limited staffing levels, support, resources and activities for service users) as well as 'locked doors' in the community (limited or no care continuity and stigma).

conclusionsThe impact of COVID-19 restrictions on people's crucial control of space provides an impetus for erecting barriers masked by the veil of habit and reconsidering the impact of the simple act of leaving the door open/locked to allow both psychiatric acute care unit staff and service users to reach their potential.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersGreeceHumansPsychotherapySARS-CoV-2Acute psychiatric careDoor locking practiceGreeceNursesOpen doors

Identifiers

PMID34983447
PMCPMC8725636
OpenAlexW4205706246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.