Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983430›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of monocyte distribution width and procalcitonin in sepsis cases in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study.

Chih-Huang Li, Chen-June Seak, Chung-Hsien Chaou, Tse-Hsuan Su, Shi-Ying Gao, Cheng-Yu Chien, Chip-Jin Ng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04322942 (Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Monocyte Distribution Width and Procalcitonin on Sepsis in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04322942 unknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Monocyte Distribution Width and Procalcitonin on Sepsis in the Emergency Department

TypeobservationalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled600ConditionsSepsis, Diagnoses DiseaseArmsMonocyte Distribution Width
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomarkers to guide sepsis management.Annals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Association of Monocyte Distribution Width with the Need for Respiratory Support in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chih-Huang LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Chen-June SeakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Chung-Hsien ChaouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Tse-Hsuan SuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Shi-Ying GaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Cheng-Yu ChienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Chip-Jin NgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (R.O.C.). ngowl@ms3.hinet.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0363-2938
Chang Gung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University of Science and Technology · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis and treatment of patients with sepsis reduce mortality significantly. In terms of exploring new diagnostic tools of sepsis, monocyte distribution width (MDW), as part of the white blood cell (WBC) differential count, was first reported in 2017. MDW greater than 20 and abnormal WBC count together provided a satisfactory accuracy and was proposed as a novel diagnostic tool of sepsis. This study aimed to compare MDW and procalcitonin (PCT)'s diagnostic accuracy on sepsis in the emergency department.

methodsThis was a single-center prospective cohort study. Laboratory examinations including complete blood cell and differentiation count (CBC/DC), MDW, PCT were obtained while arriving at the ED. We divided patients into non-infection, infection without systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), infection with SIRS, and sepsis-3 groups. This study's primary outcome is the sensitivity and specificity of MDW, PCT, and MDW + WBC in differentiating septic and non-septic patients. In addition, the cut-off value for MDW was established to maximize sensitivity at an optimal level of specificity.

resultsFrom May 2019 to September 2020, 402 patients were enrolled for data analysis. Patient number in each group was: non-infection 64 (15.9%), infection without SIRS 82 (20.4%), infection with SIRS 202 (50.2%), sepsis-3 15 (7.6%). The AUC of MDW, PCT, and MDW + WBC to predict infection with SIRS was 0.753, 0.704, and 0.784, respectively (p < 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MDW using 20 as the cutoff were 86.4%, 54.2%, 76.4%, and 70%, compared to 32.9%, 88%, 82.5%, and 43.4% using 0.5 ng/mL as the PCT cutoff value. On combing MDW and WBC count, the sensitivity and NPV further increased to 93.4% and 80.3%, respectively. In terms of predicting sepsis-3, the AUC of MDW, PCT, and MDW + WBC was 0.72, 0.73, and 0.70, respectively. MDW, using 20 as cutoff, exhibited sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 90.6%, 37.1%, 18.7%, and 96.1%, respectively, compared to 49.1%, 78.6%, 26.8%, and 90.6% when 0.5 ng/mL PCT was used as cutoff.

conclusionsIn conclusion, MDW is a more sensitive biomarker than PCT in predicting infection-related SIRS and sepsis-3 in the ED. MDW < 20 shows a higher NPV to exclude sepsis-3. Combining MDW and WBC count further improves the accuracy in predicting infection with SIRS but not sepsis-3. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered to the ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT04322942) on March 26th, 2020.

Indexed as

ProcalcitoninSepsisBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMonocytesProspective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninBiomarkerDiagnosisEmergency departmentMonocyteSepsis

Identifiers

PMID34983430
PMCPMC8725440
OpenAlexW4225271915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.