Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983370›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Secondary structure specific simpler prediction models for protein backbone angles.

M A Hakim Newton, Fereshteh Mataeimoghadam, Rianon Zaman, Abdul Sattar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M A Hakim Newton *School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. mahakim.newton@griffith.edu.au.
Fereshteh Mataeimoghadam *School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. fereshteh.mataeimoghadam@griffithuni.edu.au.
Rianon ZamanSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Abdul SattarSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein backbone angle prediction has achieved significant accuracy improvement with the development of deep learning methods. Usually the same deep learning model is used in making prediction for all residues regardless of the categories of secondary structures they belong to. In this paper, we propose to train separate deep learning models for each category of secondary structures. Machine learning methods strive to achieve generality over the training examples and consequently loose accuracy. In this work, we explicitly exploit classification knowledge to restrict generalisation within the specific class of training examples. This is to compensate the loss of generalisation by exploiting specialisation knowledge in an informed way.

resultsThe new method named SAP4SS obtains mean absolute error (MAE) values of 15.59, 18.87, 6.03, and 21.71 respectively for four types of backbone angles [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]. Consequently, SAP4SS significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods SAP, OPUS-TASS, and SPOT-1D: the differences in MAE for all four types of angles are from 1.5 to 4.1% compared to the best known results. AVAILABILITY: SAP4SS along with its data is available from https://gitlab.com/mahnewton/sap4ss .

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsMachine LearningProtein Structure, SecondaryProteinsDeep learningDihedral angle predictionProtein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID34983370
PMCPMC8728911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.