Temporal Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Palliative Care Use After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the United States.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Two decades of trends in nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage care: A nationwide analysis.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2025
   Article
2. A scoping review of end-of-life discussions and palliative care: implications for neurological intensive care among Latinos in the U.S.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024
   Article
3. Scoping Review of Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Disparities in the Diagnosis and Management of Hemorrhagic Stroke.Neurology · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as