ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2022
One-Year Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab Treatment for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Korean Patients: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of head and neck atopic dermatitis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Special sites in atopic dermatitis: Effectiveness of dupilumab on the hands in a single-centre study on 485 patients.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2024Article
- Recent updates on systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024Article
- Combined Dupilumab and Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Severe Refractory Atopic Dermatitis.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2024Article
- Therapeutic Effect of Dupilumab on Systemic and Vascular Inflammation in Adults with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Feasibility Study Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dupilumab was the first biological drug to be approved for adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), and its use is growing exponentially worldwide. Though its therapeutic efficacy and favorable safety profile have been demonstrated, data on real-world long-term experience with the drug are only beginning to accumulate. Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of Korean patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated with dupilumab. We observed excellent overall treatment efficacy with the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score decreased from 28.2 to 3.2 at week 52. Notably, the therapeutic effect was maintained despite the considerable number of patients requiring an increase in treatment intervals due to the financial burden in a real clinical setting. In contrast to the previous reports, paradoxical head and neck erythema/dermatitis was rare in our study group, and pre-existing dermatitis in the very region, as well as in the hands, responded well to dupilumab treatment. Additionally, we were able to discontinue dupilumab treatment for two patients who achieved complete clearance of AD symptoms (EASI and Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] scores of 0) for more than three months. There have been no flare-up events of AD in these patients; with topical corticosteroids alone, one of them has been completely disease-free for 43 weeks and the other has been maintaining an IGA score of 1 for 66 weeks. Furthermore, conjunctivitis was again confirmed to be the most frequent side effect associated with dupilumab, and it generally responded well to conventional conjunctivitis treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.