Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34983085›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2022

Improving zebrafish laboratory welfare and scientific research through understanding their natural history.

Carole J Lee, Gregory C Paull, Charles R Tyler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advancing Zebrafish (Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Survival Strategies and Color Preferences of Mandarin Fish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  14. Cognitive Bias in Adult Zebrafish (Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Zebrafish Models in Toxicology and Disease Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Housing Conditions Affect Adult Zebrafish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  20. Social behaviors as welfare indicators in teleost fish.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carole J LeeBiosciences, Geoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-5771-8852
Gregory C PaullBiosciences, Geoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-4419
Charles R TylerBiosciences, Geoffrey Pope Building, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2353-5748

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/R001421/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, millions of zebrafish (Danio rerio) are used for scientific laboratory experiments for which researchers have a duty of care, with legal obligations to consider their welfare. Considering the growing use of the zebrafish as a vertebrate model for addressing a diverse range of scientific questions, optimising their laboratory conditions is of major importance for both welfare and improving scientific research. However, most guidelines for the care and breeding of zebrafish for research are concerned primarily with maximising production and minimising costs and pay little attention to the effects on welfare of the environments in which the fish are maintained, or how those conditions affect their scientific research. Here we review the physical and social conditions in which laboratory zebrafish are kept, identifying and drawing attention to factors likely to affect their welfare and experimental science. We also identify a fundamental lack knowledge of how zebrafish interact with many biotic and abiotic features in their natural environment to support ways to optimise zebrafish health and well-being in the laboratory, and in turn the quality of scientific data produced. We advocate that the conditions under which zebrafish are maintained need to become a more integral part of research and that we understand more fully how they influence experimental outcome and in turn interpretations of the data generated.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareZebrafishAnimal HusbandryAnimalsDanio reriodata qualitylaboratory conditionsnatural habitatsphysical environmentsocial environmentwelfarezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34983085
PMCPMC9303617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.