Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982738›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2022

Evaluating Vitamin C in Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vitamin C Monotherapy.

David A Wacker, Susan L Burton, John P Berger, A J Hegg, Jamie Heisdorffer, Qi Wang, Emily J Medcraft, Ronald A Reilkoff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03338569 (Evaluating Vitamin C in Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03338569 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Evaluating Vitamin C in Septic Shock: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled125ConditionsSeptic Shock, SepsisArmsVitamin C, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. IV Vitamin C in Sepsis: A Latest Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of clinical practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A WackerDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Susan L BurtonDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
John P BergerM Health Fairview St. Joseph's Hospital, Saint Paul, MN.
A J HeggDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Jamie HeisdorfferCritical Care Nursing, M Health Fairview Southdale Hospital, Edina, MN.
Qi WangDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Emily J MedcraftDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Ronald A ReilkoffDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether IV vitamin C therapy reduces 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock.

designMulticenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

settingOne academic medical ICU and four community ICUs. PATIENTS: Of 167 adult patients within 24 hours of vasopressor initiation for septic shock, 126 consented to participation, and 124 received study drug and were included in analysis.

interventionsIV vitamin C (10 mg/mL in normal saline) administered as a 1,000-mg bolus over 30 minutes followed by continuous infusion of 250 mg/hr for 96 hours or placebo of equal volumes of normal saline. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOf 124 subjects receiving study drug and included in analysis, 60 received vitamin C and 64 placebo. The primary outcome of all-cause 28-day mortality (vitamin C, 26.7%; placebo, 40.6%; p = 0.10) was lower in the vitamin C arm but did not reach statistical significance. Initiation of renal replacement therapy was higher in the vitamin C arm (vitamin C, 16.7%; placebo, 3.3%; p = 0.015), as was volume of fluid administration within 6 hours of study drug initiation (vitamin C, 1.07 L; placebo, 0.76 L; p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes. In post hoc subgroup analysis, there was a decrease in 28-day mortality in the vitamin C arm among patients requiring positive-pressure ventilation at the time of enrollment (vitamin C, 36.3%; placebo, 60.0%; p = 0.05). This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT03338569.

conclusionsVitamin C monotherapy failed to significantly reduce mortality in septic shock patients as hypothesized. Our findings do not support its routine clinical use for this purpose.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticAdultAscorbic AcidDouble-Blind MethodHumansSaline SolutionVasoconstrictor AgentsVitaminsAscorbic AcidSaline SolutionVasoconstrictor AgentsVitamins

Identifiers

PMID34982738
PMCPMC9005102
OpenAlexW4205474300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.