ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2022
Selection of Beneficial Bacterial Strains With Potential as Oral Probiotic Candidates.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotic microcapsule polysaccharide-protein composite system: construction, mechanism and application.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Bacteriocinogenic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Bulgarian feta cheese and Brazilian prato cheese against Listeria monocytogenes: Bacteriocin, an ally in the control of listeriosis.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Isolation, Identification, and Validation of Strains from Commercial Probiotics: Do We Get What We Expect?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developmental ecology of the infant oral ecosystem: a framework for early childhood caries.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Integrative network pharmacology, metabolomics and gut flora studies reveal mechanisms of action ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular disease therapeutics via engineered oral microbiota: Applications and perspective.iMeta · 2024Article
- Effect of probiotics on pain and ulceration in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2024Article
- Antioxidant Effects and Probiotic Properties ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Probiotics as an Alternative to Antibiotics: Genomic and Physiological Characterization of Aerobic Spore Formers from the Human Intestine.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DM065, Isolated from the Human Oral Cavity.Microbiology resource announcements · 2022Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of Hydrogen Peroxide-Producing Limosilactobacillus fermentum DM072 Isolated from the Human Oral Cavity.Microbiology resource announcements · 2022Article
- Effects of the Probiotic,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Gut and lung microbiome profiles in pregnant mice.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Characterization ofScience progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to select beneficial strains from the oral cavity of healthy volunteers and to evaluate these as potential oral probiotic candidates. The selection process was based on the isolation, differentiation, identification, and safety assessment of LAB strains, followed by a series of experiments for the selection of appropriate candidates with beneficial properties. In the screening procedure, 8 isolates from the oral cavity of a Caucasian volunteers were identified as Streptococcus (Str.) salivarius ST48HK, ST59HK, ST61HK, and ST62HK; Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lb.) (Lactobacillus plantarum) ST63HK and ST66HK; Latilactobacillus sakei (Lb.) (Lactobacillus sakei) ST69HK; and Lactobacillus (Lb.) gasseri ST16HK based on 16S rRNA sequencing. Physiological and phenotypic tests did not show hemolytic, proteinase, or gelatinase activities, as well as production of biogenic amines. In addition, screening for the presence of efaA, cyt, IS16, esp, asa1, and hyl virulence genes and vancomycin-resistant genes confirmed safety of the studied strains. Moreover, cell-to-cell antagonism indicated that the strains were able to inhibit the growth of tested representatives from the genera Bacillus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus in a strain-specific manner. Various beneficial genes were detected including gad gene, which codes for GABA production. Furthermore, cell surface hydrophobicity levels ranging between 1.58% and 85% were determined. The studied strains have also demonstrated high survivability in a broad range of pH (4.0-8.0). The interaction of the 8 putative probiotic candidates with drugs from different groups and oral hygiene products were evaluated for their MICs. This is to determine if the application of these drugs and hygiene products can negatively affect the oral probiotic candidates. Overall, antagonistic properties, safety assessment, and high rates of survival in the presence of these commonly used drugs and oral hygiene products indicate Str. salivarius ST48HK, ST59HK, ST61HK, and ST62HK; Lb. plantarum ST63HK and ST66HK; Lb. sakei ST69HK; and Lb. gasseri ST16HK as promising oral cavity probiotic candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.