Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982399›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

Contemporary clinical management of acute pulmonary embolism: the COPE study.

Cecilia Becattini, Giancarlo Agnelli, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Francesco Dentali, Andrea Fabbri, Iolanda Enea, Fulvio Pomero, Maria Pia Ruggieri, Andrea Di Lenarda, Michele Gulizia

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03631810 (Contemporary Clinical Management Of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. The COPE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03631810 completednot on this map

Contemporary Clinical Management Of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. The COPE Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHeart Care FoundationRan2018 to 2021Enrolled5,213ConditionsAcute Pulmonary Embolism
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Acute pulmonary embolism and cancer: findings from the COPE study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cecilia BecattiniInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine-Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Piazzale Lucio Severi 1, 06129, Perugia, Italy. cecilia.becattini@unipg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-4888
Giancarlo AgnelliInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine-Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Piazzale Lucio Severi 1, 06129, Perugia, Italy.
Aldo Pietro MaggioniANMCO Research Center of the Heart Care Foundation, Florence, Italy.
Francesco DentaliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Insubria University, Varese, Italy.
Andrea FabbriEmergency Department, "Presidio ospedaliero Morgagni-Pierantoni", Forlì, Italy.
Iolanda EneaU.O.C. Medicina e Chirurgia d'Urgenza, A.O.R.N. "S. Anna e S. Sebastiano", Caserta, Italy.
Fulvio PomeroDivision of Internal Medicine, Michele and Pietro Ferrero Hospital, Verduno, Italy.
Maria Pia RuggieriU.O.C. Medicina d'Urgenza e Pronto Soccorso, AO San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Di LenardaCardiovascular Center, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Michele GuliziaDivision of Cardiology, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew management, risk stratification and treatment strategies have become available over the last years for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), potentially leading to changes in clinical practice and improvement of patients' outcome.

methodsThe COntemporary management of Pulmonary Embolism (COPE) is a prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study in patients with acute PE evaluated at internal medicine, cardiology and emergency departments in Italy. The aim of the COPE study is to assess contemporary management strategies in patients with acute, symptomatic, objectively confirmed PE concerning diagnosis, risk stratification, hospitalization and treatment and to assess rates and predictors of in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The composite of death (either overall or PE-related) or clinical deterioration at 30 days from the diagnosis of PE, major bleeding occurring in hospital and up to 30 days from the diagnosis of PE and adherence to guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) are secondary study outcomes. Participation in controlled trials on the management of acute PE is the only exclusion criteria. Expecting a 10-15%, 3% and 0.5% incidence of death for patients with high, intermediate or low-risk PE, respectively, it is estimated that 400 patients with high, 2100 patients with intermediate and 2500 with low-risk PE should be included in the study. This will allow to have about 100 deaths in study patients and will empower assessment of independent predictors of death.

conclusionsCOPE will provide contemporary data on in-hospital and 30-day mortality of patients with documented PE as well as information on guidelines adherence and its impact on clinical outcomes. TRAIL REGISTRATION: NCT number: NCT03631810.

Indexed as

Pulmonary EmbolismAcute DiseaseHemorrhageHumansProspective StudiesRiskAnticoagulantsOutcomePulmonary embolismRegistry

Identifiers

PMID34982399
PMCPMC9018669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.