ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
Patient Experience with In-Person and Telehealth Visits Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Integrated Health System in the United States.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The safety and acceptability of using telehealth for follow-up of patients following cancer surgery: A systematic review.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2023Pooled it
- The Impact of an Adaptive mHealth Intervention on Improving Patient-Provider Health Care Communication: Secondary Analysis of the DIAMANTE Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Trial
- Support for Use of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Communication Items Among Seriously Ill Patients.Journal of palliative medicine · 2023Trial
- Real-World Utilization and Patient Acceptance of Telemedicine in Otorhinolaryngology: A Single-Center Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patient-Centered Communication in Telehealth Settings.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Examination of Patient and Provider Satisfaction, Benefits, and Challenges with Psychiatric Outpatient and Hospital-Based Telehealth Treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding telemedicine among physicians and employees at Tanta University Hospitals, Egypt.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2025Article
- Utilization and patient experiences of telehealth among Medicaid expansion enrollees.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Global Evidence on the Sustainability of Telemedicine in Outpatient and Primary Care During the First 2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review Using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Associations of Patient Experience With Doctor-Patient Communication and Patient-Reported Physical and Mental Health in Seriously Ill Adults.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Visit Experience and Fulfillment of Care Needs in Primary Care Differs for Video Visits Compared to In-person and Chat Visits.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Telemedicine: Future of the healthcare system and its impact on patient satisfaction: A literature review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Review
- Telemedicine Compared to Office-Based Care of Patients With Cardiac Symptoms: Treatment and Outcomes.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Positive Deviance Theory: Leveraging Compliments Data to Guide Strategic Planning for Patient Experience Improvement in a Large Rural Health Care System.The Permanente journal · 2024Article
- Evaluating the delivery of care by telemedicine for incarcerated people living with HIV: a cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Rethinking the Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Consult: Creating a Patient-Centered, See-and-Treat Model of Care.O&G open · 2024Article
- Satisfaction with Telehealth Care in the United States: Cross-Sectional Survey.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of a Measure to Assess Patient Experiences With Video Care Encounters.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Patient Characteristics and Telemedicine Use in the US, 2022.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Patient Satisfaction With Telemedicine Among Vulnerable Populations in an Urban Ambulatory Setting.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInformation about telehealth versus in-office visits and how patient experience before compared to during the COVID-19 pandemic is important for healthcare planning.
objectiveTo compare patient experience by visit type and before and during the pandemic.
designSurvey of patients assessing ambulatory care before and during the pandemic.
participantsA total of 58,500 adult patients (13,928 primary care and 44,581 specialty physician visits) at a large integrated health system with 197 clinics on the west coast of the United States. The majority were female (59%), 55 or older (65%), and non-Hispanic White (55%), and had an in-office visit (87%) while 10% had a tele-video and 3% a phone visit. MAIN MEASURES: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Survey 3.0 doctor communication, care coordination, access, and office staff composites; an overall rating of the doctor; and whether the patient would recommend the doctor to family and friends. KEY
resultsPatient experience with telehealth visits was as positive as or more positive than that with traditional office-based visits. Doctor communication on tele-video visits was viewed as slightly more positive than that of in-office or phone visits. Tele-video visits were also slightly more positive than in-office visits for care coordination, overall rating of the doctor, and willingness to recommend to family and friends. Office staff were viewed less positively on the phone than tele-video or in-office visits. Patient experience was similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., on a 0-100 possible range with a higher score being better, doctor communication was 94.4 before and 94.9 during).
conclusionsThe positive experiences with telehealth, especially tele-video, may be due to patient appreciation of efforts made to maintain access, the focused nature of telehealth visits, and help by staff for navigation technical issues. Lessons learned about delivering responsive telehealth care can be used to ensure high-quality care after the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.