Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982276›Full record

ReviewCell regeneration (London, England)2022

Modeling human neurodevelopmental diseases with brain organoids.

Xiaoxiang Lu, Jiajie Yang, Yangfei Xiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell regeneration (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Morphine-inducedFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Trisomy 21 Phenotype.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoxiang LuSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Jiajie YangSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Yangfei XiangSchool of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China. xiangyf@shanghaitech.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6256-6312

Funding

shanghai pujiang program 20PJ1410400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the etiology of human neurodevelopmental diseases has long been a challenging task due to the brain's complexity and its limited accessibility. Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs)-derived brain organoids are capable of recapitulating various features and functionalities of the human brain, allowing the investigation of intricate pathogenesis of developmental abnormalities. Over the past years, brain organoids have facilitated identifying disease-associated phenotypes and underlying mechanisms for human neurodevelopmental diseases. Integrating with more cutting-edge technologies, particularly gene editing, brain organoids further empower human disease modeling. Here, we review the latest progress in modeling human neurodevelopmental disorders with brain organoids.

Indexed as

Brain organoidsDisease modelingGene editingNeurodevepmental diseasesStem cells

Identifiers

PMID34982276
PMCPMC8727646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.