ArticleCurrent microbiology2022
Co-cultivation Approach to Decipher the Influence of Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacterium on Growth and N Uptake in Rice Crop.
Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibacterial and Biopriming Effects of Nostocales Cyanobacteria on Tomato Plants Infected with Bacterial Spot Disease.Current microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of selected potential nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterial strain (Anabaena sp.), isolated from rhizospheric soil of rice plants on growth, pigments, N uptake, root architecture, and image-based phenotypic traits of rice crop using co-cultivation approach under controlled sand culture conditions. We studied the beneficial interaction of cyanobacterium to rice using sensor image-based Phenomics approach as well as conventional methods. Co-cultivation experiment revealed that inoculation with Anabaena sp. significantly improved plant growth, chlorophyll, leaf area, % nitrogen, and protein of rice by ~ 70%, ~ 22%, ~ 60%, and ~ 25% under 100% nitrogen input in comparison with un-inoculated control. Further, comparative evaluation revealed superior performance of Anabaena sp. at 100% and 75% N followed by 50% N input improving below-ground parameters as well as phenotypic traits as compared to control treatment. Hence, inoculation performed better with inorganic nitrogen input for overall growth of rice crop. Therefore, cyanobacterial strain can be used as an efficient bio-inoculant for sustainable rice production under integrated nutrient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34982252What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.