Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982221›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

Strabismus outcomes after surgery: the nationwide SOS France study.

Quentin Colas, Jean Capsec, Sophie Arsène, Pierre Jean Pisella, Leslie Grammatico-Guillon, Raoul K Khanna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quentin ColasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bretonneau University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours, France.
Jean CapsecRegional Unit of Epidemiology (EpiDcliC), Service of Medical Information, Epidemiology and Medical Economy, Teaching Hospital of Tours, Medical School, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Sophie ArsèneDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bretonneau University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours, France.
Pierre Jean PisellaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bretonneau University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours, France.
Leslie Grammatico-GuillonRegional Unit of Epidemiology (EpiDcliC), Service of Medical Information, Epidemiology and Medical Economy, Teaching Hospital of Tours, Medical School, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Raoul K KhannaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bretonneau University Hospital, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37044, Tours, France. raoul.khanna@univ-tours.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-1488
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the types of strabismus operated on, the surgical procedures performed, and the 2-year reoperation rate in France.

methodsEntire population 5-year cross-sectional analysis of a national medico-administrative database in France between January 2013 and December 2017 included all patients who underwent a first strabismus surgery, with a 2-year follow-up. Patient identification was based on the diagnostic codes of the 10th International Classification of Diseases and surgical procedures on the codes of the Common Classification of Medical Acts. A subgroup analysis comparing non-paralytic and paralytic strabismus was performed.

resultsAmong the 56,654 patients included (women: 50.8%), 26,892 (47.5%) patients were under 10 years old. Overall, 52,711 (93%) were diagnosed with non-paralytic strabismus and 3,943 (7%) with paralytic strabismus. Among the non-paralytics, the most frequent diagnosis was esotropia (21,282, 37.6%), followed by exotropia (14,392, 25.4%) and vertical strabismus (2,017, 3.6%). Among the paralytics, fourth cranial nerve palsy (1,499, 2.6%) was more frequent than sixth cranial nerve palsy (691, 1.2%) and third cranial nerve palsy (431, 0.8%). The 2-year reoperation rate was 7.7% (4,362 patients), the lowest for non-paralytic (7.4%) and the highest for paralytic (11.4%).

conclusionThis first French population-based study about strabismus will contribute to the evaluation of practices at a national level and permit comparisons between countries. Although the 2-year reoperation rate was found to be 1 out of 13 patients, it should be interpreted with caution. Long-term follow-up is still warranted due to considerable variability of the type and severity of strabismus as well as surgical practices.

Indexed as

StrabismusChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansOculomotor MusclesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesEsotropiaExotropiaOculomotor surgeryParalytic strabismusReoperation

Identifiers

PMID34982221
OpenAlexW4206079071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.