Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982216›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2022

Effect of ectomycorrhizal fungal species on population growth and food preference of a fungivorous nematode.

Yudai Kitagami, Yosuke Matsuda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yudai KitagamiLaboratory of Forest Mycology, Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, Kurimamachiya 1577, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan. kitagami@bio.mie-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3947-3556
Yosuke MatsudaLaboratory of Forest Mycology, Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, Kurimamachiya 1577, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21H02232Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K14876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungivorous nematodes can use ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi as food resources in forest soils, and they may establish close predator-prey relationships in forest ecosystems. However, the effect of ECM fungal species on the growth of fungivorous nematodes is poorly studied. To identify fungivorous nematode propagation and preference for ECM fungi, we investigated the in vitro population growth and food attraction of the fungivorous nematode Aphelenchoides sp. on media with four ECM fungal species: Cenococcum geophilum, Pisolithus tinctorius, Rhizopogon roseolus and Suillus granulatus. Individual nematodes were fed on hyphae of all four ECM fungal species grown on modified Melin-Norkrans agar media. Nematode numbers were significantly lower on P. tinctorius than on all other fungal species. The other three species produced similar population growth rates, with S. granulatus producing the greatest number of nematodes at 2, 3 and 4 weeks and C. geophilum and R. roseolus producing the largest number after 8 weeks. In the histogram for nematode length classes, a unimodal pattern was fitted for P. tinctorius and R. roseolus, but a bimodal pattern was fitted for C. geophilum and S. granulatus by the Silverman test. The attraction of nematodes to S. granulatus was significantly higher than that to other ECM fungi. Our findings suggest that the propagation and body size of nematodes are ECM fungal species dependent. Predator-prey relationships between fungivorous nematodes and ECM fungi may accelerate nutrient cycles in forest ecosystems.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaeNematodaAnimalsEcosystemFood PreferencesPopulation GrowthAphelenchoides sp.Body sizeEctomycorrhizal fungal isolatesFood attractionForaging observationSilverman test

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.