Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982033›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Similar neural and perceptual masking effects of low-power optogenetic stimulation in primate V1.

Spencer Chin-Yu Chen, Giacomo Benvenuti, Yuzhi Chen, Satwant Kumar, Charu Ramakrishnan, Karl Deisseroth, Wilson S Geisler, Eyal Seidemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cellular-resolution optogenetics reveals attenuation-by-suppression in visual cortical neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Compact deep neural network models of visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Spencer Chin-Yu ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, United States.
Giacomo BenvenutiCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5234-6260
Yuzhi ChenCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.
Satwant KumarCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.
Charu RamakrishnanCNC Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Karl DeisserothCNC Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Wilson S GeislerCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.
Eyal SeidemannCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2841-5948
The University of Texas at Austin · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USStanford University · US

Funding

Resource Core 3 - Teaching/Training/Dissemination Core (TTDC)U19NS118284 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SEIDEMANN, EYAL J · 2021 to 2025
$18.1M
Linking Neural Population Activity and Visual PerceptionR01EY016454 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI SEIDEMANN, EYAL J · 2005 to 2024
$6.6M
Visual Search and Detection in Natural ScenesR01EY024662 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GEISLER, WILSON S · 2015 to 2022
$2.9M
An optical-genetic toolbox for reading and writing neural population codes in functional mapsU01NS099720 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GEISLER, WILSON S, SEIDEMANN, EYAL J · 2016 to 2018
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS R01 EY016454NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024662NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099720NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS118284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can direct stimulation of primate V1 substitute for a visual stimulus and mimic its perceptual effect? To address this question, we developed an optical-genetic toolkit to 'read' neural population responses using widefield calcium imaging, while simultaneously using optogenetics to 'write' neural responses into V1 of behaving macaques. We focused on the phenomenon of visual masking, where detection of a dim target is significantly reduced by a co-localized medium-brightness mask (Cornsweet and Pinsker, 1965; Whittle and Swanston, 1974). Using our toolkit, we tested whether V1 optogenetic stimulation can recapitulate the perceptual masking effect of a visual mask. We find that, similar to a visual mask, low-power optostimulation can significantly reduce visual detection sensitivity, that a sublinear interaction between visual- and optogenetic-evoked V1 responses could account for this perceptual effect, and that these neural and behavioral effects are spatially selective. Our toolkit and results open the door for further exploration of perceptual substitutions by direct stimulation of sensory cortex.

Indexed as

AnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsOptogeneticsPerceptual MaskingPhotic StimulationProof of Concept StudyVisual CortexVisual Perceptionawake behaving monkeyC1V1GCaMPneural population codingneurosciencerhesus macaquevisual cortexvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID34982033
PMCPMC8765749
OpenAlexW4220935157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.